+1 (nb) Thanks, Alex
On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 4:51 AM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > Kind regards, Fokko > > Op do 4 dec 2025 om 08:25 schreef Eduard Tudenhöfner > <[email protected]>: >> >> Adding my own +1. >> >> @Dmitri Yes I've extracted the Spec changes out of the impl PR into >> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14448 to have less code to review. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 12:27 AM Steve <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 11:36 AM Drew <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > +1 (non-binding) >>> > >>> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 11:35 AM Honah J. <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> +1 (binding) >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 1:27 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 12:18 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> +1(binding) >>> >>>> Yufei >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:38 AM Prashant Singh >>> >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Best, >>> >>>>> Prashant Singh >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:14 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> >>> >>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> +1 >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 9:54 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov >>> >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Hi Eduard, >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> I will maintain my (non-binding) vote from 2024. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> However, the initial email on this vote mentions spec wording >>> >>>>>>> changes in PR [10877]. Yet, this PR is just an impl. change in the >>> >>>>>>> java library (now). >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> The spec change appears to be in PR [14448] now. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> [10877] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877 >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> [14448] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14448 >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>> >>>>>>> Dmitri. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 12:27 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner >>> >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> We discussed this topic today in the Iceberg Catalog sync and >>> >>>>>>>> people asked to bump this VOTE thread again as the VOTE is >>> >>>>>>>> essentially still alive. >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 10:45 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> >>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> While I agree that the configurable separator is the best >>> >>>>>>>>> solution that balances trade-offs, I don't think that we should >>> >>>>>>>>> move forward when there has been a veto from the community. >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> In Iceberg and most ASF communities, votes are intended to >>> >>>>>>>>> confirm consensus --- not to make decisions. Since we don't have >>> >>>>>>>>> consensus we should continue discussion and see if we can address >>> >>>>>>>>> Robert's rationale for his veto. (Which was, unfortunately, in a >>> >>>>>>>>> different thread that I'd have to dig up.) >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> Ryan >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 9:07 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 (no-binding) >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Personally I don't want this change, but I haven't found any >>> >>>>>>>>>> other ways to address issue #10338. It seems that this proposal >>> >>>>>>>>>> is the best solution available. >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, at 23:36, Zac Blanco wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>> > +1 (nb) >>> >>>>>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> > On 2024/08/20 07:05:45 Robert Stupp wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> -1 (nb) >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> On 16.08.24 17:46, Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > +1 (nb) to the spec change. >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Cheers, >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Dmitri. >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 4:31 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Hey everyone, >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > as I mentioned on the DISCUSS thread, this is providing >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > a simple >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > path forward for users of the V1 APIs (make the >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > namespace >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > separator *configurable* instead of *hardcoded*) that >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > are either >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > running into issue #10338 >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10338> or will >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > eventually when they upgrade their server stack. >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > The configuration part is *entirely optional* for REST >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > server >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > implementers and there's no behavioral change for >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > existing >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > installations. >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Please vote on the wording changes in the REST Spec in >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > #10877 >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877>. >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Thanks >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > Eduard >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> -- >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> Robert Stupp >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> @snazy >>> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>> >>>>>>>>>> Xuanwo >>> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> https://xuanwo.io/
