-1 (but I think we can address the concern easily) I just added a comment to the PR that's a blocker for me. We introduced an explicit enumeration of cloud providers which I strongly oppose codifying in the spec.
That limits other providers from leveraging the signing portion of the spec without a spec change and is unnecessarily strict. This should be a simple update to address, but I can't support this change until we remove that. -Dan On Wed, Mar 4, 2026 at 8:44 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2026 at 7:33 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> This is a second vote attempt in order to adopt the promotion of the >> remote signing endpoint to the main REST spec. >> >> Related links: >> >> ML thread: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/2kqdqb46j7jww36wwg4txv6pl2hqq9w7 >> PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15450 >> >> Please vote within the next 72 hours. >> >> [ ] +1 Adopt the promotion of the remote signing endpoint to the main >> REST spec >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1 Do not adopt, please explain why >> >> Thanks, >> Alex >> >
