+1

On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 6:07 PM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Gentle reminder to review the revised spec changes:
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15450
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 5:21 PM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > FYI the required changes were implemented:
> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15450
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alex
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 5, 2026 at 9:49 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > With one binding -1, the vote does not pass. I will prepare the
> > > requested changes and start another vote thread when we're ready.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Alex
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2026 at 11:12 PM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > -1 (but I think we can address the concern easily)
> > > >
> > > > I just added a comment to the PR that's a blocker for me.  We
> introduced an explicit enumeration of cloud providers which I strongly
> oppose codifying in the spec.
> > > >
> > > > That limits other providers from leveraging the signing portion of
> the spec without a spec change and is unnecessarily strict.
> > > >
> > > > This should be a simple update to address, but I can't support this
> change until we remove that.
> > > >
> > > > -Dan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2026 at 8:44 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> +1 (non binding)
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards
> > > >> JB
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2026 at 7:33 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hi all,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> This is a second vote attempt in order to adopt the promotion of
> the
> > > >>> remote signing endpoint to the main REST spec.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Related links:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ML thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/2kqdqb46j7jww36wwg4txv6pl2hqq9w7
> > > >>> PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15450
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Please vote within the next 72 hours.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [ ] +1 Adopt the promotion of the remote signing endpoint to the
> main REST spec
> > > >>> [ ] +0
> > > >>> [ ] -1 Do not adopt, please explain why
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>> Alex
>

Reply via email to