Unfortunately, due to a change in the dependencies set, we can't easily backport the commit from the main branch.
I can propose a PR to fix the licenses in the 1.10.x branch. I will work on it right now. Regards JB On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 4:23 PM Maximilian Michels <[email protected]> wrote: > @JB Thanks for watching the licenses! Which commits do we need to > backport to address this? > > -Max > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 4:28 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > 0 (non binding) > > > > I checked: > > - source distribution > > -- signature and checksum are good > > -- LICENSE and NOTICE are correct > > -- ASF header is present in all expected files > > -- No compiled/binary file found in the source distribution > > - iceberg-aws-bundle > > -- LICENSE is not complete: > > --- AWS SDK cloudwatch is not in the LICENSE > > --- AWS SDK retries is not in the LICENSE > > --- AWS SDK s3control is not in the LICENSE > > --- failsafe is not in the LICENSE (shaded in AWS S3) > > --- parquet is not in the LICENSE (shaded in AWS S3) > > --- jctools is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Netty) > > - iceberg-azure-bundle > > -- LICENSE is not correct: > > --- azure-core is not in the LICENSE > > --- azure-xml is not in the LICENSE > > --- jctools is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Netty) > > --- gson is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Jose) > > --- jackson-core is not correct in LICENSE (LICENSE contains 2.18.4, but > the jar version seems to be 2.18.4.1) > > - iceberg-gcp-bundle > > -- LICENSE and NOTICE are correct here > > - iceberg-flink-runtime > > -- LICENSE is not correct: > > --- openhft hashing is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Parquet) > > --- Apache DataSketches is not in the LICENSE > > --- LocationTech JTS is not in the LICENSE > > - iceberg-spark-runtime > > -- LICENSE is not correct: > > --- Eclipse Collections is not in the LICENSE > > --- LocationTech JTS is not in the LICENSE > > --- Apache DataSketches is not in the LICENSE > > --- openhft hashing is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Parquet) > > > > I'm happy to propose a PR to fix that on the 1.10.x branch (main should > be good already, I will do a pass). > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 5:54 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Everyone, > >> > >> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache > Iceberg 1.10.2 release. > >> > >> The commit ID is 1f76a4951710e0a5abab5c9cf5603693ee2f4753 > >> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.10.2-rc0 > >> * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.10.2-rc0 > >> * > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/1f76a4951710e0a5abab5c9cf5603693ee2f4753 > >> > >> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: > >> * > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.10.2-rc0 > >> > >> You can find the KEYS file here: > >> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS > >> > >> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven repository > URL is: > >> * > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1277/ > >> > >> Please download, verify, and test. > >> > >> Instructions for verifying a release can be found here: > >> * https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#how-to-verify-a-release > >> > >> Please vote in the next 72 hours. > >> > >> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.10.2 > >> [ ] +0 > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this because... > >> > >> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are > encouraged to cast > >> non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 votes > and more binding > >> +1 votes than -1 votes. >
