Thanks JB! When the PR for fixing the license/notice is ready just let us know. I went ahead and merged the trailing slash fix for HMS since I think it does make sense to include in a patch release.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 8:13 AM Manu Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi JB, > I created https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/16013 for you. > > Meanwhile, I think it will be good to get in > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16010, back-port of > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14295, fixing the trailing slash > issue for database paths in HMS. > > Thanks, > Manu > > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 12:58 AM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Here's the runtime-deps.txt file diff between `apache-iceberg-1.10.1` and >> `1.10.x` >> https://github.com/kevinjqliu/iceberg/pull/17/files >> >> Looks like we've mostly just change the library versions. >> >> That said, we should still ensure that all entries are present in the >> respective NOTICE and LICENSE files. Thanks for catching that, JB! >> >> Best, >> Kevin Liu >> >> On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 8:08 AM Manu Zhang <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Unfortunately, due to a change in the dependencies set, we can't easily >>>> backport the commit from the main branch. >>> >>> >>> Yes, I think JB's fix for main is >>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15449 and I'm also working on a >>> fix for the open-api module >>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15872>. >>> BTW, is this a new issue in 1.10.x that we have to fix in 1.10.2, or is >>> it a long standing issue that we can fix later on main branch? >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 11:00 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Unfortunately, due to a change in the dependencies set, we can't easily >>>> backport the commit from the main branch. >>>> >>>> I can propose a PR to fix the licenses in the 1.10.x branch. I will >>>> work on it right now. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 4:23 PM Maximilian Michels <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> @JB Thanks for watching the licenses! Which commits do we need to >>>>> backport to address this? >>>>> >>>>> -Max >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 4:28 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > 0 (non binding) >>>>> > >>>>> > I checked: >>>>> > - source distribution >>>>> > -- signature and checksum are good >>>>> > -- LICENSE and NOTICE are correct >>>>> > -- ASF header is present in all expected files >>>>> > -- No compiled/binary file found in the source distribution >>>>> > - iceberg-aws-bundle >>>>> > -- LICENSE is not complete: >>>>> > --- AWS SDK cloudwatch is not in the LICENSE >>>>> > --- AWS SDK retries is not in the LICENSE >>>>> > --- AWS SDK s3control is not in the LICENSE >>>>> > --- failsafe is not in the LICENSE (shaded in AWS S3) >>>>> > --- parquet is not in the LICENSE (shaded in AWS S3) >>>>> > --- jctools is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Netty) >>>>> > - iceberg-azure-bundle >>>>> > -- LICENSE is not correct: >>>>> > --- azure-core is not in the LICENSE >>>>> > --- azure-xml is not in the LICENSE >>>>> > --- jctools is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Netty) >>>>> > --- gson is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Jose) >>>>> > --- jackson-core is not correct in LICENSE (LICENSE contains 2.18.4, >>>>> but the jar version seems to be 2.18.4.1) >>>>> > - iceberg-gcp-bundle >>>>> > -- LICENSE and NOTICE are correct here >>>>> > - iceberg-flink-runtime >>>>> > -- LICENSE is not correct: >>>>> > --- openhft hashing is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Parquet) >>>>> > --- Apache DataSketches is not in the LICENSE >>>>> > --- LocationTech JTS is not in the LICENSE >>>>> > - iceberg-spark-runtime >>>>> > -- LICENSE is not correct: >>>>> > --- Eclipse Collections is not in the LICENSE >>>>> > --- LocationTech JTS is not in the LICENSE >>>>> > --- Apache DataSketches is not in the LICENSE >>>>> > --- openhft hashing is not in the LICENSE (shaded in Parquet) >>>>> > >>>>> > I'm happy to propose a PR to fix that on the 1.10.x branch (main >>>>> should be good already, I will do a pass). >>>>> > >>>>> > Regards >>>>> > JB >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 5:54 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Hi Everyone, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache >>>>> Iceberg 1.10.2 release. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> The commit ID is 1f76a4951710e0a5abab5c9cf5603693ee2f4753 >>>>> >> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.10.2-rc0 >>>>> >> * >>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.10.2-rc0 >>>>> >> * >>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/1f76a4951710e0a5abab5c9cf5603693ee2f4753 >>>>> >> >>>>> >> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>>>> >> * >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.10.2-rc0 >>>>> >> >>>>> >> You can find the KEYS file here: >>>>> >> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven >>>>> repository URL is: >>>>> >> * >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1277/ >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Please download, verify, and test. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Instructions for verifying a release can be found here: >>>>> >> * >>>>> https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#how-to-verify-a-release >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Please vote in the next 72 hours. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.10.2 >>>>> >> [ ] +0 >>>>> >> [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members >>>>> are encouraged to cast >>>>> >> non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 >>>>> votes and more binding >>>>> >> +1 votes than -1 votes. >>>>> >>>>
