+1 (binding)
On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 10:45 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 5:03 PM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Posted some minor comments but overall good to have them!
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 10:27 PM Andrei Tserakhau via dev
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > чт, 25 июн. 2026 г., 16:20 Manu Zhang <[email protected]>:
> > >>
> > >> +1 (non-binding). I'm really excited about the use cases it can
> unblock.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Manu
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 1:27 PM Szehon Ho <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>
> > >>> Went over it, it seems a nice elegant definition.
> > >>> Thanks
> > >>> Szehon
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 9:00 PM Anoop Johnson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 7:26 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 3:52 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I'd like to start a vote to adopt the new expressions spec. This
> spec defines the minimal structure and behavior of expressions that Iceberg
> formats need to store and exchange. This is intended to clean up
> expressions used in the REST catalog spec (exchanging query filters) and to
> enable new use cases that require expressions to be stored in metadata,
> including expression defaults (`current_timestamp()`) and `CHECK`
> constraints (`col < 360.0`).
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> This spec is PR #16652. Thank you to everyone that has discussed
> this in community syncs or reviewed the design doc and PR!
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> [ ] +1: Adopt the expressions spec
> > >>>>>> [ ] +0: . . .
> > >>>>>> [ ] -1: Do not add the spec because . . .
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Ryan
>

Reply via email to