+1 (binding)
On 2026/06/25 16:48:20 Ryan Blue wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 9:24 AM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1(binding) > > > > Yufei > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 9:13 AM Russell Spitzer <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> +1 (binding) > >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 10:45 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 (non-binding) > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 5:03 PM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > +1 (non-binding) > >>> > > >>> > Posted some minor comments but overall good to have them! > >>> > > >>> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 10:27 PM Andrei Tserakhau via dev > >>> > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > +1 (non-binding) > >>> > > > >>> > > чт, 25 июн. 2026 г., 16:20 Manu Zhang <[email protected]>: > >>> > >> > >>> > >> +1 (non-binding). I'm really excited about the use cases it can > >>> unblock. > >>> > >> > >>> > >> Thanks, > >>> > >> Manu > >>> > >> > >>> > >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 1:27 PM Szehon Ho <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> +1 (binding) > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Went over it, it seems a nice elegant definition. > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> > >>> Szehon > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 9:00 PM Anoop Johnson <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 7:26 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> +1 (binding) > >>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 3:52 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> Hi everyone, > >>> > >>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> I'd like to start a vote to adopt the new expressions spec. > >>> This spec defines the minimal structure and behavior of expressions that > >>> Iceberg formats need to store and exchange. This is intended to clean up > >>> expressions used in the REST catalog spec (exchanging query filters) and > >>> to > >>> enable new use cases that require expressions to be stored in metadata, > >>> including expression defaults (`current_timestamp()`) and `CHECK` > >>> constraints (`col < 360.0`). > >>> > >>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> This spec is PR #16652. Thank you to everyone that has > >>> discussed this in community syncs or reviewed the design doc and PR! > >>> > >>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: > >>> > >>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> [ ] +1: Adopt the expressions spec > >>> > >>>>>> [ ] +0: . . . > >>> > >>>>>> [ ] -1: Do not add the spec because . . . > >>> > >>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>> > >>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> Ryan > >>> > >> >
