+1 (binding)

Verified signatures and checksums, and the licenses.
Built from source and ran the unit an integration tests.

Sung

On 2026/08/31 08:37:15 Fokko Driesprong wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> 
> Thanks Alex for driving this release! Verified signatures, checksums and did 
> some tests.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Fokko
> 
> On 2026/08/29 17:21:03 Kevin Liu wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> > 
> > Verified signature, checksum, license, build and tests.
> > 
> > And thank you JB, I create a github issue to track the license issue
> > identified in this thread:
> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/3877
> > 
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 12:12 PM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Verified sigs/sums/license/build/tests
> > >
> > > -Dan
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 6:06 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 (non binding)
> > >>
> > >> I checked:
> > >> - source distribution
> > >> -- signature and checksum are correct
> > >> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good
> > >> -- ASF header present in all expected files
> > >> -- No binary/compiled file in the source distribution
> > >> -- whl distributions
> > >> -- signature and checksum are correct
> > >> -- LICENSE
> > >> --- LICENSE in whl says the Thrift/Hive code is in vendor/fb303 and
> > >> vendor/hive_metastore. That's correct for the source distribution, but
> > >> in whl, it's actually located directly in fb303 and hive_metastore
> > >> (without vendor). So, the documentation is correct but the path is
> > >> not. It would be good to fix this.
> > >> --- The whl distributions bundle Cython 3.3.0 runtime code
> > >> (cython_runtime, __reduce_cython_ in the so lib). I checked: Cython is
> > >> Apache 2.0 license without NOTICE file. We should document Cython in
> > >> our LICENSE file (in the whl distributions)
> > >> -- NOTICE is good
> > >> -- ASF header is present. nit: the header in
> > >> pyiceberg/expressions/literals.py looks weird to me. It should
> > >> probably use the same header as the other files.
> > >>
> > >> It would be great to fix these minor issues in the next release (I'm
> > >> happy to create the corresponding PRs :)).
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> JB
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> - binary distribution
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 7:33 PM Alex Stephen via dev
> > >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > Hi Everyone,
> > >> >
> > >> > I propose that we release the following RC as the official PyIceberg
> > >> 0.12.0 release.
> > >> >
> > >> > A summary of the high level features:
> > >> >
> > >> > * View support
> > >> > * Geometry and Geography type support
> > >> > * Python 3.14 support
> > >> > * New File Format API
> > >> > * Commit retry support
> > >> > * Many, many various bug fixes and improvements
> > >> >
> > >> > The commit ID is 75396614a5f093cf24e93c7d916ee2cda0bdf44e
> > >> >
> > >> > * This corresponds to the tag: pyiceberg-0.12.0rc2
> > >> (277ad2600c67728ee5992a3441879f6a46836422)
> > >> > *
> > >> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/releases/tag/pyiceberg-0.12.0rc2
> > >> > *
> > >> https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/tree/75396614a5f093cf24e93c7d916ee2cda0bdf44e
> > >> >
> > >> > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
> > >> >
> > >> > * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/pyiceberg-0.12.0rc2/
> > >> >
> > >> > You can find the KEYS file here:
> > >> >
> > >> > * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
> > >> >
> > >> > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on pypi:
> > >> >
> > >> > https://pypi.org/project/pyiceberg/0.12.0rc2/
> > >> >
> > >> > And can be installed using: pip3 install pyiceberg==0.12.0rc2
> > >> >
> > >> > Instructions for verifying a release can be found here:
> > >> >
> > >> > * https://py.iceberg.apache.org/verify-release/
> > >> >
> > >> > Please download, verify, and test.
> > >> >
> > >> > Please vote in the next 72 hours.
> > >> > [ ] +1 Release this as PyIceberg 0.12.0
> > >> > [ ] +0
> > >> > [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
> > >>
> > >
> > 
> 

Reply via email to