+1 (binding) I think it is good to have a way to expose catalog metadata that does not require overriding or reserving table properties.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2026 at 8:58 AM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks for driving this, Andrei! > > Kind regards, > Fokko > > On 2026/09/03 15:55:55 Daniel Weeks wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks, Andrei, for all the work on this! > > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2026 at 2:48 PM Andrei Tserakhau via dev < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > Following the discussion on IRC Labels and the catalog syncs, I'd like > to > > > restart the vote specifically on the spec change: add optional > > > catalog-provided labels on "LoadTableResult" and "LoadViewResult". > > > > > > The proposal is intentionally limited to a read-only, flat key-value > > > representation of catalog-provided metadata. Structured tag entities > and > > > write APIs remain separate follow-ups. > > > > > > This vote is on the REST spec change in [3]. The other links below are > > > supporting context and implementations, and are not part of the vote. > > > > > > Discussion: > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/0mpgn3p2xhlf5165m40oxbptmcf7f87m > > > > > > Proposal: > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/15521 > > > > > > Spec PR (subject of this vote): > > > [3] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15750 > > > > > > Design doc: > > > [4] > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aj-6JlfBiMYEEVtNuh5WLMOrRQiMCcyYUGbouPM4hXI/edit?usp=drivesdk > > > > > > Reference implementations / POCs: > > > [5] Core read-path support: > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/17337 > > > [6] Core "SupportsLabels": > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/17410 > > > [7] Spark exposure: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/17411 > > > [8] Gravitino IRC labels POC: > > > https://github.com/laskoviymishka/gravitino/pull/1 > > > > > > Catalog sync recording: > > > [9] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCTV-Rhiwyc > > > > > > Thanks everyone for the discussion and feedback! > > > > > > Vote: > > > > > > [ ] +1 Adopt the spec change in [3] > > > [ ] 0 No opinion > > > [ ] -1 Do not adopt, because... > > > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Andrei > > > > > >
