My vote is +1 (binding).

The vote passes with 4 binding +1 votes, 3 non-binding +1 votes, and
no -1 votes.

Binding +1:
Russell
Sung
Fokko
Matt

Non-Binding +1:
Neelesh
Andrei
Xuanwo

Thanks everyone! I'll get the release moving!

--Matt

On Thu, Oct 1, 2026 at 4:14 AM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Checked signature/checksum and ran the tests.
>
> Thanks Matt!
>
> Kind regards,
> Fokko
>
> On 2026/09/30 16:33:50 Sung Yun wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > - verified signature and checksum
> > - tarball matches the rc0 tag
> > - LICENSE/NOTICE/headers look good
> > - ran verify_rc.sh on macOS arm64 with go 1.26.4, all tests pass
> >
> > Sung
> >
> > On 2026/09/30 16:25:18 Russell Spitzer wrote:
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Verified all the normal things (Checksums, Keys, Signatures)
> > > Ran the dev verification suite included in the Repo
> > > Complained about "Claude.md" to Matt :)
> > > Ran all tests and such.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 2:21 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > I verified the SHA-512 checksum and signature, matched the source 
> > > > archive
> > > > to v0.7.0-rc0, checked LICENSE/NOTICE and license headers, and built the
> > > > downloaded source.
> > > >
> > > > The default test suite passes with Go 1.25.9 on Linux: 3,344 tests 
> > > > passed.
> > > > On Go 1.27.1, I observed one Puffin checksum error-message assertion
> > > > failure; the call still rejected the corrupted input. I consider this
> > > > non-blocking.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for preparing the release!
> > > >
> > > > Xuanwo
> > > >
> > >
> >

Reply via email to