+1 (binding) On Tue, Oct 27, 2026 at 8:51 PM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2026, 6:50 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2026 at 5:33 PM Anoop Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2026, 5:15 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> This is a vote for the stats-only fields discussed in this thread >>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/t4nm0blbo33y5fnkcok6lrmdc4k4toxr>. >>>> The changes are in PR #18405 >>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/18405>. This change adds a >>>> `stats-fields` list that assigns table field IDs so that stats for >>>> partition fields and expressions like `to_lower_case` can be stored in the >>>> `content_stats` struct. >>>> >>>> Please vote within the next 72 hours. >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Add stats-only fields to the table spec >>>> [ ] +0 >>>> [ ] -1 Do not add stats-only fields because . . . >>>> >>>
