+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Oct 28, 2026 at 7:50 AM Péter Váry <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2026, 04:15 Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2026 at 8:51 PM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2026, 6:50 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2026 at 5:33 PM Anoop Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2026, 5:15 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> This is a vote for the stats-only fields discussed in this thread. The >>>>>> changes are in PR #18405. This change adds a `stats-fields` list that >>>>>> assigns table field IDs so that stats for partition fields and >>>>>> expressions like `to_lower_case` can be stored in the `content_stats` >>>>>> struct. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please vote within the next 72 hours. >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Add stats-only fields to the table spec >>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not add stats-only fields because . . .
