In general, we can keep it simple and say iggy just like opendal https://crates.io/crates/opendal
So that, our current package names remain the same. The descriptions, license files will contain Apache Iggy (Incubating). Yonik, Xuanwo, tison, hulk: your thoughts? Best, Kranti On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:52 PM Grzegorz Koszyk <[email protected]> wrote: > Bumping this, since the migration process start to accelerate, we would > like to gather feedback about whether we can maintain our current names for > packages. > > On 2025/02/09 09:35:56 Grzegorz Koszyk wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As we migrate our project to the apache repository, we started wondering > > about naming conventions used for package names. > > For instance, as I was looking through NuGet gallery, I've noticed that > > some packages have `Apache` prefix added to them [1] > > and in addition to being owned by individual contributors they have an > > `asf` owner account [2] > > > > Is this some convention or it's up to the project to decide what package > ID > > to use ? > > > > Additionally, we have a few docker hub repositories for our server, > web-ui > > and in the future probably benchmark suite as well. > > How should we go about it ? will we get a dedicated Apache docker hub > > repository ? > > > > > > [1] https://www.nuget.org/packages/Apache.Arrow > > [2] https://www.nuget.org/profiles/asf > > > > Best, > > Grzegorz > > >
