One more important thing here - distinction between overall compatibility
and module compatibility. We may face serious bugs which severely affects
single module/subsystem and fix will break backward ocmpatibility only on
of that module.
E.g. currently in IGFS file might be locked for write forever in case of
abrupt shutdown of a node from which this write were initiated. The only
way to fix this reliably is to change an object which travels over a wire,
what might break backward compatibility.

May be we should be able to relax compatibility requirements on module
level sometimes?

Vladimir.

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote:

> On 26.08.2015 08:54, Alexey Goncharuk wrote:
> > This particular change does not break the compatibility (a new method is
> > being added to the public API), however I am +1 for adding these
> principles
> > to the dev documentation.
>
> Way back when Ignite was still a podling I pointed out this:
>
>     http://apr.apache.org/versioning.html
>
>
> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/releasing.html#release-compat
>
> As I did then, I suggest we either refer to these docs directly, or copy
> over essentially the same principles to our docs.
>
> -- Brane
>
>
> > 2015-08-25 23:44 GMT-07:00 Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org>:
> >
> >> Reading this I thought it would be a good idea to articulate some of the
> >> possible challenges that we will face in the future.
> >>
> >> Say, how we add/release incompatible changes like API modifications,
> >> deprecations, etc. Say, introduction of incompatible changes shouldn't
> be
> >> done
> >> in minor release of a project: Scala "transition" 2.9 -> 2.10 comes to
> >> mind as
> >> a biggest screw-up of the kind. Hence, to avoid being a laughing stock
> of
> >> the
> >> world's developers it would makes perfect sense to have some of these
> >> seemingly obvious principles either written or referred among other
> >> development resources.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>     Cos
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:17PM, Alexey Goncharuk wrote:
> >>> Ken, I added comments to the pull request on GitHub.
> >>>
> >>> I would prefer another committer to review this pull request as well
> >> since
> >>> public API is being changed (Dmitriy, Yakov?)
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> AG
> >>>
> >>> 2015-08-25 22:53 GMT-07:00 Ken Cheng <kcheng....@gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Devs,
> >>>>
> >>>> Anybody can help me to do a code review for PR
> >>>>
> >>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/35
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> kcheng
> >>>>
>
>

Reply via email to