On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Denis Magda <[email protected]> wrote:
> Igniters,
>
> I've faced with some confusing places in cache related documentations.
> Before fixing it I want to be sure that my understanding is correct.
>
> - CacheAtomicityMode.TRANSACTIONAL. There is a sentence saying: /"However,
> cache * atomicity mode will be changed to {@link #ATOMIC} starting from
> version {@code 5.2}, * so it is recommended that desired atomicity mode is
> explicitly configured * instead of relying on default value."
> /In my understanding it's time to remove the sentence, correct?
>
Agree, let's remove it.
>
> - CacheConfiguration.getAtomicityMode() returns null if the mode wasn't
> explicitly set. But this is not highlighted in the documentation.
> I propose to initialize internal variable with DFLT_CACHE_ATOMICITY_MODE
> at the time the CacheConfiguration instance is being created .
> Is anyone knows a reason why we should initialization logic as is?
>
I don't mind, but we must make sure whether the "null" value in
configuration gets a special treatment.
>
> - CacheAtomicityMode.ATOMIC. There is a sentence: /"This mode is currently
> implemented for {@link CacheMode#PARTITIONED} caches only."
> /This seems to be an outdated info. I can easily create a replicated cache
> with atomic mode.
> Let's remove the sentence?
Yes, let's remove it (this is very misleading).
>
> --
> Denis
>