Vladislav, how can I take a look at the code and run your tests? --Yakov
2015-11-11 12:33 GMT+03:00 Vladisav Jelisavcic <vladis...@gmail.com>: > Yakov, > > sorry for running a bit late. > > > Vladislav, do you have any updates for > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-638? Or any questions? > > > > --Yakov > > I have problems with some fail-over scenarios; > It seems that if the two nodes are in the middle of acquiring or releasing > the semaphore, > and one of them fails, all nodes get: > > [09:36:38,509][ERROR][ignite-#13%pub-null%][GridCacheSemaphoreImpl] > <ignite-atomics-sys-cache> Failed to compare and set: > o.a.i.i.processors.datastructures.GridCacheSemaphoreImpl$Sync$1@5528b728 > class org.apache.ignite.internal.cluster.ClusterTopologyCheckedException: > Failed to acquire lock for keys (primary node left grid, retry transaction > if possible) [keys=[UserKeyCacheObjectImpl [val=GridCacheInternalKeyImpl > [name=ac83b8cb-3052-49a6-9301-81b20b0ecf3a], hasValBytes=true]], > node=c321fcc4-5db5-4b03-9811-6a5587f2c253] > ... > Caused by: class > org.apache.ignite.internal.cluster.ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed > to acquire lock for keys (primary node left grid, retry transaction if > possible) [keys=[UserKeyCacheObjectImpl [val=GridCacheInternalKeyImpl > [name=ac83b8cb-3052-49a6-9301-81b20b0ecf3a], hasValBytes=true]], > node=c321fcc4-5db5-4b03-9811-6a5587f2c253] > at > > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.colocated.GridDhtColocatedLockFuture.newTopologyException(GridDhtColocatedLockFuture.java:1199) > ... 10 more > > > I'm still trying to find out how to exactly reproduce this behavior, > I'll send you more details once I try few more things. > > I am still using partitioned cache, does it make sense to use replicated > cache instead? > > > Other than that, I'm done with everything else. > > Thanks, > Vladisav > > > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Raul Kripalani <ra...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Sorry I haven't made an appearance in this thread yet. > > > > > 6. MQTT streamer > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-535 > > > > Yes, it was merged to master before the ignite-1.5 was created. > > > > I'd like to add: > > > > Camel Streamer => https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1790 > > -- I'll merge this as soon as I finished with the OSGi tickets with > demand. > > > > OSGi Manifests, Karaf features and possible ClassLoaderCodec SPI (or > > whatever agreement we arrive to in mailing lists and Wiki) > > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1527 > > -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1877 > > -- I'm working actively on these two features. > > > > *Raúl Kripalani* > > PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data and > > Messaging Engineer > > http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani > > http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > Guys, > > > > > > I think we can start preparation to Ignite-1.5 release which will > include > > > many interesting features: > > > > > > 1. Portable object API > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1486 > > > > > > 2. Ignite.NET and Ignite C++ > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1282 > > > > > > 3. Optimistic serializable transactions > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1607 > > > > > > 4. Distributed SQL joins - we will be able to query non-collocated data > > as > > > well > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1232 > > > > > > 5. Enhanced Oracle and IBM JDK interoperability > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1526 > > > > > > 6. MQTT streamer > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-535 > > > > > > 7. Continuous query failover > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-426 > > > > > > 8. Significant transactional cache performance optimizations - I will > > merge > > > these changes from 'ignite-1.4-slow-server-debug' today or tomorrow. > > > > > > 9. Many stability and fault-tolerance fixes. > > > > > > 10. I would also like to include distributed Semaphore. Vladislav, any > > > chance you can finish with it this week? > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE- > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-426>638 > > > > > > Thanks to everyone involved! Guys, esp. assignees of mentioned issues, > > > please respond to this email and let us know when can we expect your > > > changes being merged to master and release branch? > > > > > > Can someone create ignite-1.5 release branch? > > > > > > --Yakov > > > > > >
