We keep getting a steady stream of users confused by gridName :) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3207 seems to be abandoned, should we unassign it?
Pavel. On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[email protected]> wrote: > Great! I think I like “instanceName” better, just in case if this name will > be provided for information purposes on other nodes. > > D. > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3207 > > > > I have stated "localInstanceName" there, because "instanceName" may not > be > > clear enough. > > > > Pavel. > > > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > [email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > I like the change, as long as we do not remove, but *deprecate* the > > > gridName property and update all the documentation and examples. > > > > > > Pavel, can you please file a ticket? > > > > > > D. > > > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn < > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > We have got a TON of questions on gridName property. Everyone thinks > > that > > > > clusters are formed based on the gridName, that is, nodes with the > same > > > > grid name will join one cluster, and nodes with a different name will > > be > > > in > > > > a separate cluster. > > > > > > > > I suggest to deprecate this property and add instanceName instead. > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > Pavel. > > > > > > > > > >
