Biao, are you still working on this ticket or should someone else in the community pick it up?
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org> wrote: > We keep getting a steady stream of users confused by gridName :) > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3207 seems to be abandoned, > should we unassign it? > > Pavel. > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Great! I think I like “instanceName” better, just in case if this name > will > > be provided for information purposes on other nodes. > > > > D. > > > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@gridgain.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3207 > > > > > > I have stated "localInstanceName" there, because "instanceName" may not > > be > > > clear enough. > > > > > > Pavel. > > > > > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > > dsetrak...@apache.org > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I like the change, as long as we do not remove, but *deprecate* the > > > > gridName property and update all the documentation and examples. > > > > > > > > Pavel, can you please file a ticket? > > > > > > > > D. > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn < > > ptupit...@gridgain.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > We have got a TON of questions on gridName property. Everyone > thinks > > > that > > > > > clusters are formed based on the gridName, that is, nodes with the > > same > > > > > grid name will join one cluster, and nodes with a different name > will > > > be > > > > in > > > > > a separate cluster. > > > > > > > > > > I suggest to deprecate this property and add instanceName instead. > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > Pavel. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
