'nodeName' sounds like it has to be unique across nodes in topology, which is wrong.
I don't think there is a perfect name for this, but 'igniteName' or 'igniteInstanceName' seem to be the best options for me. -Val On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > To be honest both instanceName and igniteInstanceName sound confusing to > me. I still need to go to the documentation to figure out what the hell > “instance” is. Personally, if the property was called “nodeName” or > “igniteNodeName” then I would’t need to refer to the docs because everyone > knows what “node”, “cluster”, “grid” is. > > What are the main arguments against “nodeName”? > > — > Denis > > > On Dec 30, 2016, at 11:58 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@gridgain.com> > wrote: > > > > instanceName is confusing in, for example, SpringCacheManager and several > > other places. See email from Alexander. > > > > Btw, gridName was OK for GridConfiguration:) > > > > -- > > Yakov Zhdanov > >
