Alexander,

Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!

Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes? Can I start 
testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?

[1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability 
<https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>

—
Denis
 
> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Folks,
> 
> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now good to
> be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
> 
> Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be
> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later.
> 
> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new features on
> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly):
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> 
> On failing tests:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?focusedCommentId=15683377
> 
> - Alex
> 
> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko
> <[email protected]>:
>> Vlad,
>> 
>> Most likely today.
>> 
>> - Alex
>> 
>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected]>:
>>> Igniters,
>>> 
>>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems that we are
>>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest remaining
>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for 1.8 as soon
>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might happen?
>>> 
>>> Vladimir.
>>> 
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Roman,
>>>> 
>>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. Recently there was
>>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties related to
>>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions co-exist at
>>>> the same time.
>>>> 
>>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the documentation
>>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a hidden page
>>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible once the next
>>>> version is created after the release.
>>>> 
>>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a suffix
>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create readme.io <
>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible.
>>>> 
>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html <
>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html>
>>>> 
>>>> —
>>>> Denis
>>>> 
>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Denis,
>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features?
>>>>> -Roman
>>>>>   On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Igor,
>>>>> 
>>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged into 1.8
>>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall merge
>>>> happens.
>>>>> 
>>>>> —
>>>>> Denis
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML they will
>>>> break tests
>>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that before DML
>>>> is merged.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge my changes
>>>> and check
>>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests and examples
>>>> are ready.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <[email protected]
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor binary
>>>> mode)
>>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8.
>>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. But I can't
>>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <[email protected]
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,*
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related changes into 1.8
>>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] documentation and be
>>>> sure
>>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET usability
>>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache Ignite users?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <[email protected] <mailto:
>>>> [email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who can take over
>>>> the
>>>>>>> release process of 1.8?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:alexander.a.paschenko@
>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Current status on DML:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is mostly about
>>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify streamer's
>>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved easily).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary hash codes
>>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 branch, I will ask
>>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in
>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as follows:
>>>>>>>    - testPutWithFieldsHashing
>>>>>>>    - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
>>>>>>>    - testPutWithCustomHashing
>>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version of auto
>>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very hashing
>>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests passed. So could
>>>>>>> you please take a look?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 

Reply via email to