Me personal preference is to have a separate interface with all the
supported async methods. Basically in 2.0 we can have the same withAsync()
method but it will return this new interface.

Sergi

2016-12-20 21:31 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>:

> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Sergi Vladykin <sergi.vlady...@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > +1 For removing withAsync. It is a broken design.
> >
>
> Sergi, do you also want to add all the async methods to the main API or do
> you have some other design in mind?
>

Reply via email to