How difficult is this change? Does not look like it can be done overnight. On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected]> wrote:
> We already discussed this several months ago in other thread. > > "Async" methods is the most simple and straight API possible. .NET world > goes this way all over their frameworks and nobody died. Hazelcast also > goes this way. Java goes this way (see CompletableFuture). This is common > and well-known practice. The most impacted part of our API will be cache, > +33 new methods. Though, I do not see how it can affect learning curve. > > Agree that we should deprecate AsyncSupport gradually and remove it no > earlier than in Apache Ignite 3.0. > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Sergi Vladykin < > [email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > +1 For removing withAsync. It is a broken design. > > > > > > > Sergi, do you also want to add all the async methods to the main API or > do > > you have some other design in mind? > > >
