Hi Thanks Yakov and Vladimir!
In general I'm ok for Yakov's suggestion though a bit not clear why discovery by network mask will take long time. Is the discovery spi single-threaded and Ignite processes the addresses consequentially? On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Agree with Vladimir. > > > > However, this functionality maybe useful in some cases. As far as I > > remember we support port range notation, e.g. 127.0.0.1:47500..47509, > but > > we don't have this for addresses. If we implement this I would suggest > the > > same approach, e.g 192.168.0.1..5:47500 > > > > Thoughts? > > > > --Yakov > > > -- Sergey Kozlov GridGain Systems www.gridgain.com
