Denis The initial idea was to have a simple ability to put ip address ranges. Probably we need to google how other products implement ip address ranges in its (Spring) configurations.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:28 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > If to do this as flexible as possible we can support ranges for every byte > applying a format like the one below. > > 10.0.0.[1-10] > [10-11].0.0.[1-10] > 128.[165-165].10.[1-100] > > What do you think? > > — > Denis > > > On Jan 10, 2017, at 3:08 AM, Sergey Kozlov <skoz...@gridgain.com> wrote: > > > > I like the idea to use the full range notation like 10.0.0.1..10.0.0.100. > > One issue we may face is the using of the addresses from different > networks > > like 10.0.0.201..10.0.1.100. > > > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> Guys, before I file a ticket - should we support range notation for each > >> byte in IP address? I think we should. > >> > >> --Yakov > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Sergey Kozlov > > GridGain Systems > > www.gridgain.com > > -- Sergey Kozlov GridGain Systems www.gridgain.com
