Well, looks like only committers can edit the pages. Could you prepare the content and paste it here? I’ll update the migration guide for you.
— Denis > On Mar 13, 2017, at 9:59 AM, Kozlov Maxim <dreamx....@gmail.com> wrote: > > No, I can not edit other pages. > > Screenshots menu: > https://www.dropbox.com/s/hbhuk3tci7k77qr/%D0%A1%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%88%D0%BE%D1%82%202017-03-13%2019.51.30.png?dl=0 > > <https://www.dropbox.com/s/hbhuk3tci7k77qr/%D0%A1%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%88%D0%BE%D1%82%202017-03-13%2019.51.30.png?dl=0> > https://www.dropbox.com/s/43nr384icfb6xwp/%D0%A1%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%88%D0%BE%D1%82%202017-03-13%2019.50.24.png?dl=0 > > <https://www.dropbox.com/s/43nr384icfb6xwp/%D0%A1%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%88%D0%BE%D1%82%202017-03-13%2019.50.24.png?dl=0> > > >> 13 марта 2017 г., в 19:44, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org >> <mailto:dma...@apache.org>> написал(а): >> >> Weird, can you edit any other page? I can’t find any configuration >> parameters that should prevent you from editing. >> >> — >> Denis >> >>> On Mar 13, 2017, at 9:14 AM, Kozlov Maxim <dreamx....@gmail.com >>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Denis, I can not edit this page. >>> >>> confluence username: dreamx >>> >>>> 13 марта 2017 г., в 19:01, Kozlov Maxim <dreamx....@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>>> написал(а): >>>> >>>> Denis, >>>> >>>> ok >>>> >>>>> 13 марта 2017 г., в 18:59, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org >>>>> <mailto:dma...@apache.org> <mailto:dma...@apache.org >>>>> <mailto:dma...@apache.org>> <mailto:dma...@apache.org >>>>> <mailto:dma...@apache.org><mailto:dma...@apache.org >>>>> <mailto:dma...@apache.org>>>> написал(а): >>>>> >>>>> Maxim, >>>>> >>>>> Please update Apache Ignite 2.0 migration guide: >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.0+Migration+Guide >>>>> >>>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.0+Migration+Guide><https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.0+Migration+Guide >>>>> >>>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.0+Migration+Guide>><https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.0+Migration+Guide >>>>> >>>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.0+Migration+Guide><https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.0+Migration+Guide >>>>> >>>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.0+Migration+Guide>>> >>>>> >>>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.0+Migration+Guide >>>>> >>>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.0+Migration+Guide><https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.0+Migration+Guide >>>>> >>>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.0+Migration+Guide>><https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.0+Migration+Guide >>>>> >>>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.0+Migration+Guide><https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.0+Migration+Guide >>>>> >>>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.0+Migration+Guide>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You need to say that the parameter has been discontinued and the users >>>>> can use CacheAtomicWriteOrderMode.PRIMARY instead. >>>>> >>>>> Agreed? >>>>> >>>>> — >>>>> Denis >>>>> >>>>>> On Mar 10, 2017, at 12:06 AM, Kozlov Maxim <dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Andrey, Alexey, please review >>>>>> PR - https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1521 >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1521> >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1521 >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1521>> >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1521 >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1521> >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1521 >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1521>>> >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1521 >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1521> >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1521 >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1521>> >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1521 >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1521> >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1521 >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1521>>>> >>>>>> tests - >>>>>> http://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests_RunAll&branch_IgniteTests=pull%2F1521%2Fhead&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests_RunAll&branch_IgniteTests=pull%2F1521%2Fhead&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv><http://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests_RunAll&branch_IgniteTests=pull%2F1521%2Fhead&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests_RunAll&branch_IgniteTests=pull%2F1521%2Fhead&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv>><http://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests_RunAll&branch_IgniteTests=pull%2F1521%2Fhead&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests_RunAll&branch_IgniteTests=pull%2F1521%2Fhead&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv><http://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests_RunAll&branch_IgniteTests=pull%2F1521%2Fhead&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests_RunAll&branch_IgniteTests=pull%2F1521%2Fhead&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests_RunAll&branch_IgniteTests=pull/1521/head&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests_RunAll&branch_IgniteTests=pull/1521/head&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv><http://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests_RunAll&branch_IgniteTests=pull/1521/head&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests_RunAll&branch_IgniteTests=pull/1521/head&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv>><http://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests_RunAll&branch_IgniteTests=pull/1521/head&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests_RunAll&branch_IgniteTests=pull/1521/head&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv><http://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests_RunAll&branch_IgniteTests=pull/1521/head&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests_RunAll&branch_IgniteTests=pull/1521/head&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> 7 марта 2017 г., в 14:15, Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org >>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org> <mailto:ag...@apache.org >>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org >>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org><mailto:ag...@apache.org >>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org>>>> написал(а): >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maxim, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> all GridClockSyncProcessor related code should be remove (objects, >>>>>>> messages, etc) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Kozlov Maxim <dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Andrey, or better remove GridTimeSyncProcessorSelfTest class? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 7 марта 2017 г., в 12:21, Kozlov Maxim <dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>>>> написал(а): >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Andrey, in GridTimeSyncProcessorSelfTest class methods: >>>>>>>>> testTimeSync() and testTimeSyncChangeCoordinator() also removed? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 6 марта 2017 г., в 18:42, Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org> <mailto:ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org><mailto:ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org>>>> написал(а): >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Maxim, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> About SER_VER_COMPARATOR. You can use code branch that executes when >>>>>>>>>> times are equal: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> int nodeOrder1 = ver1.nodeOrder(); >>>>>>>>>> int nodeOrder2 = ver2.nodeOrder(); >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> if (nodeOrder1 == nodeOrder2) { >>>>>>>>>> long order1 = ver1.order(); >>>>>>>>>> long order2 = ver2.order(); >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> assert order1 != order2; >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> return order1 > order2 ? 1 : -1; >>>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>>> else >>>>>>>>>> return nodeOrder1 > nodeOrder2 ? 1 : -1; >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Alexey Goncharuk >>>>>>>>>> <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com <mailto:alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:alexey.goncha...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>> >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:alexey.goncha...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:alexey.goncha...@gmail.com><mailto:alexey.goncha...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Maxim, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Global time comparison is only needed for CLOCK mode, so you should >>>>>>>>>>> modify >>>>>>>>>>> the code as if ignoreTime is always true. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2017-03-06 18:13 GMT+03:00 Kozlov Maxim <dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>>>>: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ok, >>>>>>>>>>>> in GridCacheAtomicVersionComparator class, method >>>>>>>>>>>> compare(GridCacheVersion one, GridCacheVersion other, boolean >>>>>>>>>>>> ignoreTime) >>>>>>>>>>>> if (globalTime == otherGlobalTime || ignoreTime) { // => if >>>>>>>>>>>> (ignoreTime) { >>>>>>>>>>>> ..... >>>>>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>>>>> else >>>>>>>>>>>> return globalTime > otherGlobalTime ? 1 : -1; // => return -1; >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> and, >>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheMvcc class, >>>>>>>>>>>> SER_VER_COMPARATOR is comparator by globalTime var. His remove and >>>>>>>>>>>> remove >>>>>>>>>>>> compareSerializableVersion? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 6 марта 2017 г., в 16:51, Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org> <mailto:ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org> <mailto:ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org>>>> написал(а): >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> updateTime() method should be removed. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Kozlov Maxim >>>>>>>>>>>>> <dreamx....@gmail.com <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In CacheEntryImplEx class use ver.globalTime() in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Override public long updateTime() { >>>>>>>>>>>>>> return ver.globalTime(); >>>>>>>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Than is better to replace this variable? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3 марта 2017 г., в 19:19, Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org> <mailto:ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org> <mailto:ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org>>>> написал(а): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the next implementation will be good enough: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public IgniteUuid asGridUuid() { >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return new IgniteUuid(new UUID(nodeOrderDrId, topVer), order); >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Serialization/deserialization of GridCacheVersion.globalTime >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be removed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Kozlov Maxim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dreamx....@gmail.com <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public IgniteUuid asGridUuid() { >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return new IgniteUuid(new UUID(nodeOrderDrId << 32, topVer << >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 32), >>>>>>>>>>>> order); >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you want to change or not? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - GridCacheVersion.writeTo(ByteBuffer buf, MessageWriter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> writer) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - GridCacheVersion.readFrom(ByteBuffer buf, MessageReader >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reader) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use globalTime variable, must be removed case 0: (in both >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> methods) or >>>>>>>>>>>> replace globalTime? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 марта 2017 г., в 16:58, Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org> <mailto:ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org> <mailto:ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org>>>> написал(а): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Removing of asGridUuid() method can lead to much code changes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be avoided on this step. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Alexey Goncharuk >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:alexey.goncha...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:alexey.goncha...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:alexey.goncha...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see several usages of asGridUuid() method, so I would just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remove >>>>>>>>>>>> global >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time and use nodeOrderDrId and topVer as different parts of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> high >>>>>>>>>>>> and low >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parts of the embedded UUID. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --AG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-03-02 12:39 GMT+03:00 Kozlov Maxim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com><mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>><mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com><mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>>>>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When removed parameter globalTime, in method: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public IgniteUuid asGridUuid() { >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return new IgniteUuid(new UUID(((long)topVer << 32) | >>>>>>>>>>>> nodeOrderDrId, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> globalTime), order); >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> globalTime parameter replaced by something or remove this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 марта 2017 г., в 12:07, Kozlov Maxim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com><mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com><mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review PR again. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1 марта 2017 г., в 18:47, Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org> <mailto:ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org> <mailto:ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that it is ok. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Kozlov Maxim < >>>>>>>>>>>> dreamx....@gmail.com <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com><mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok. What do you say for the rest? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1 марта 2017 г., в 18:15, Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org> <mailto:ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org> <mailto:ag...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that during renaming we should not lose "Atomic" >>>>>>>>>>>> prefix. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Kozlov Maxim < >>>>>>>>>>>> dreamx....@gmail.com <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com><mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, ok. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also remove in the modules/platform/dotnet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CacheAtomicWriteOrderMode.cs? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rename classes: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheAtomicNearCacheSelfTest.startGrids -> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheAtomicNearCacheSelfTest.startGridsLocal (commit) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteCacheAtomicPrimaryWriteOrderWithStoreInvokeTest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteCacheWithStoreInvokeTest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteCacheAtomicPrimaryWriteOrderInvokeTest -> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteCacheInvokeTest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteCacheAtomicPrimaryWriteOrderNearEnabledStoreValueTest >>>>>>>>>>>> -> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteCacheNearEnabledStoreValueTest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheAtomicPrimaryWriteOrderNearRemoveFailureTest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheNearRemoveFailureTest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheAtomicPrimaryWriteOrderRemoveFailureTest -> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheRemoveFailureTest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheAtomicPrimaryWriteOrderFailoverSelfTest -> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheFailoverSelfTest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheValueConsistencyAtomicPrimaryWriteOrderNearEnabledS >>>>>>>>>>>> elfTest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -> GridCacheValueConsistencyNearEnabledSelfTest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CacheContinuousQueryAsyncFailoverAtomicPrimaryWriteOrderSelfTest >>>>>>>>>>>> -> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CacheContinuousQueryAsyncFailoverSelfTest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CacheContinuousQueryFailoverAtomicPrimaryWriteOrderSelfTest >>>>>>>>>>>> -> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CacheContinuousQueryFailoverSelfTest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheAtomicNearCacheSelfTest.testNoBackupsPrimaryWriteOrder >>>>>>>>>>>> -> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheAtomicNearCacheSelfTest.testNoBackups >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheAtomicNearCacheSelfTest. >>>>>>>>>>>> testWithBackupsPrimaryWriteOrder >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -> GridCacheAtomicNearCacheSelfTest.testWithBackups >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Remove classes: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteCacheAtomicPrimaryWriteOrderStoreValueTest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheReplicatedAtomicPrimaryWriteOrderMultiNodeFullApiSe >>>>>>>>>>>> lfTest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheAtomicPrimaryWriteOrderMultiNodeFullApiSelfTest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheAtomicPrimaryWriteOrderMultiNodeP2PDisabledFullApiS >>>>>>>>>>>> elfTest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheAtomicPrimaryWrityOrderOffHeapMultiNodeFullApiSelfT >>>>>>>>>>>> est >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheAtomicPrimaryWriteOrderOffHeapFullApiSelfTest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheAtomicPrimaryWriteOrderFullApiSelfTest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheAtomicPrimaryWriteOrderReloadAllSelfTest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteCachePutRetryAtomicPrimaryWriteOrderSelfTest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheValueConsistencyAtomicPrimaryWriteOrderSelfTest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteCacheAtomicPrimaryWriteOrderExpiryPolicyTest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok? :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1 марта 2017 г., в 2:04, Andrey Gura >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ag...@apache.org <mailto:ag...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org <mailto:ag...@apache.org>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org <mailto:ag...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org <mailto:ag...@apache.org>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it should be removed. If somebody use entry last >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update >>>>>>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (e.g. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for conflict resolving) they should store this time >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as entry >>>>>>>>>>>> field. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dsetrak...@apache.org <mailto:dsetrak...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dsetrak...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dsetrak...@apache.org>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dsetrak...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dsetrak...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dsetrak...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dsetrak...@apache.org>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we still need GridClockSyncProcessor? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:26 AM, Andrey Gura < >>>>>>>>>>>> ag...@apache.org <mailto:ag...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org <mailto:ag...@apache.org>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org <mailto:ag...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ag...@apache.org <mailto:ag...@apache.org>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, this setting doesn't make sense anymore. So we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need >>>>>>>>>>>> remove >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> related methods. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also there is component called >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridClockSyncProcessor that >>>>>>>>>>>> also >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be removed. It will lead to removing globalTime >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheVersion class and some related methods. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Kozlov Maxim < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dreamx....@gmail.com <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com><mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Valentin, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then there is no need for setting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CacheConfiguration. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atomicWriteOrderMode. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think, remove it and and related >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> methods? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 28 февр. 2017 г., в 2:49, Valentin Kulichenko < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Max, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In case we remove the CLOCK mode, I think we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>> remove the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enum >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too, as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well as configuration properties and other code >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using >>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enum. Having >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enum with one value doesn't make sense to me. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Val >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 5:09 AM, Kozlov Maxim < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dreamx....@gmail.com <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com><mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Igniters, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After remove CLOCK mode, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CacheAtomicWriteOrderMode enum >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contains now >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one value PRIMARY. Andrey Gura, proposition >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remove >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CacheAtomicWriteOrderMode enum. Will there be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> special for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> purpose is enum? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jira: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587>><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Max K. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Max K. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Max K. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Max K. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Max K. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Max K. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Max K. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Max K. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> Max K. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>> Max K. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>> Max K. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>> Max K. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Max K. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards, >>> Max K. >> > > -- > Best Regards, > Max K.
