Den, Mentioned enum is removed in PR for IGNITE-4587 issue. This PR isn't merged into master branch yet.
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Denis Magda <[email protected]> wrote: > Do we need to merge anything else to the master branch or you mean the enum > was removed with the rest of the changes before and merged by Andrey G? > > — > Denis > >> On Mar 30, 2017, at 5:16 AM, Kozlov Maxim <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> + Denis >> >>> 30 марта 2017 г., в 12:14, Kozlov Maxim <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> написал(а): >>> >>> Denis, >>> >>> CacheAtomicWriteOrderMode enum already removed. >>> >>>> 30 марта 2017 г., в 7:38, Denis Magda <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> написал(а): >>>> >>>> Maxim, Andrey G., Igniters, >>>> >>>> What if go further and remove CacheAtomicWriteOrderMode enum from the >>>> public API at all? I see no sense to keep it for the only one option left >>>> - PRIMARY. >>>> >>>> Any objections? >>>> >>>> — >>>> Denis >>>> >>>>> On Feb 27, 2017, at 8:09 AM, Kozlov Maxim <[email protected] >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Igniters, >>>>> >>>>> After remove CLOCK mode, CacheAtomicWriteOrderMode enum contains now only >>>>> one value PRIMARY. Andrey Gura, proposition remove >>>>> CacheAtomicWriteOrderMode enum. Will there be something special for this >>>>> purpose is enum? >>>>> >>>>> jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587 >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587> >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587 >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Best Regards, >>>>> Max K. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards, >>> Max K. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Best Regards, >> Max K. >> >> >> >> >
