Den,

Mentioned enum is removed in PR for IGNITE-4587 issue. This PR isn't
merged into master branch yet.

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Do we need to merge anything else to the master branch or you mean the enum 
> was removed with the rest of the changes before and merged by Andrey G?
>
> —
> Denis
>
>> On Mar 30, 2017, at 5:16 AM, Kozlov Maxim <dreamx....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> + Denis
>>
>>> 30 марта 2017 г., в 12:14, Kozlov Maxim <dreamx....@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>> написал(а):
>>>
>>> Denis,
>>>
>>> CacheAtomicWriteOrderMode enum already removed.
>>>
>>>> 30 марта 2017 г., в 7:38, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org 
>>>> <mailto:dma...@apache.org>> написал(а):
>>>>
>>>> Maxim, Andrey G., Igniters,
>>>>
>>>> What if go further and remove CacheAtomicWriteOrderMode enum from the 
>>>> public API at all? I see no sense to keep it for the only one option left 
>>>> - PRIMARY.
>>>>
>>>> Any objections?
>>>>
>>>> —
>>>> Denis
>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 27, 2017, at 8:09 AM, Kozlov Maxim <dreamx....@gmail.com 
>>>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Igniters,
>>>>>
>>>>> After remove CLOCK mode, CacheAtomicWriteOrderMode enum contains now only 
>>>>> one value PRIMARY. Andrey Gura, proposition remove 
>>>>> CacheAtomicWriteOrderMode enum. Will there be something special for this 
>>>>> purpose is enum?
>>>>>
>>>>> jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587 
>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587> 
>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587 
>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>> Max K.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Max K.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Max K.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to