The iteration happens multiple time which means that the key-value API had to return an empty result set on second or third iteration. But this never happens.
In any case, do you want to find a root of the issue and fix it? Otherwise, we can update the description and wait while someone else fixes it. — Denis > On Apr 14, 2017, at 1:33 AM, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV <alkuznetsov...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Because expiry time is 10 seconds, while loop iterates every 5 seconds > > пт, 14 апр. 2017 г. в 11:32, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV <alkuznetsov...@gmail.com>: > >> No, the bug is in SQL query, not key-value storage. >> >> пт, 14 апр. 2017 г. в 11:11, Vladislav Pyatkov <vldpyat...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Denis, Aleksey, >>> >>> It is correct, remember I have already said something like[1]. >>> I have no idea, why this happened in this case with SQL. >>> >>> [1]: >>> >>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/TouchedExpiryPolicy-works-incorrect-in-some-cases-IGNITE-4401-td16349.html#a16356 >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> I could reproduce the issue and this should be what Denis K. meant by >>>> saying “expiration policy works incorrectly”. >>>> >>>> If you remove the expiration policy from the caches' configuration then >>>> the issue disappears. In general, SQL engine processes an expiration >>> event >>>> properly because the SQL queries return an empty result set as expected >>> but >>>> something doesn’t work well with key-value operations. >>>> >>>> *Denis K*, *Vlad P.*, as creators of the ticket please confirm that this >>>> is the case. >>>> >>>> Please keep debugging this and switch to the latest Ignite version. >>>> >>>> — >>>> Denis >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Apr 13, 2017, at 4:22 AM, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV < >>> alkuznetsov...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> any feedback? >>>>> >>>>> чт, 13 апр. 2017 г. в 11:51, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV < >>> alkuznetsov...@gmail.com >>>>> : >>>>> >>>>>> You should run ExpiryPolicyTest. The output should contain strings >>> like >>>>>> contains? new AffinityKey("1", "1"): and contains?2 new >>>> AffinityKey("1", " >>>>>> 1"): and empty cursor? = >>>>>> If you look at them you will see, that cache contains affinity key >>> new >>>>>> AffinityKey("1", "1") whereas cursor is empty(on second iteration). >>> From >>>>>> this output you can conclude SQL query returns icorrect data(empty >>>> value) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> чт, 13 апр. 2017 г. в 3:42, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Bluntly speaking I have no idea where to look and what to expect. >>> This >>>> is >>>>>>> output of the test execution of my machine: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> SQL res: [[1], [d]] >>>>>>> 2 >>>>>>> Op consume: 303 >>>>>>> Value: org.ignite.test.EDU@22db8f4 >>>>>>> SQL res: [] >>>>>>> 0 >>>>>>> Op consume: 9 >>>>>>> Value: org.ignite.test.EDU@29caf222 >>>>>>> SQL res: [] >>>>>>> 0 >>>>>>> Op consume: 15 >>>>>>> Value: org.ignite.test.EDU@7cd1ac19 >>>>>>> SQL res: [] >>>>>>> 0 >>>>>>> Op consume: 5 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please be more specific, there are too many files in the code. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> — >>>>>>> Denis >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Apr 12, 2017, at 4:50 AM, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV < >>>>>>> alkuznetsov...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So what do u think about the issue ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ср, 12 апр. 2017 г. в 10:42, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV < >>>>>>> alkuznetsov...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have already attached simlified version. Shall i simplify it >>> more ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> вт, 11 апр. 2017 г. в 19:28, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Can you attach the simplified version? Just want to avoid any side >>>>>>> effects. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> — >>>>>>>>> Denis >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 11, 2017, at 9:14 AM, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV < >>>>>>> alkuznetsov...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I took it from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4401 >>> < >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4401> and >>> simplified . >>>>>>> See >>>>>>>>> in attached >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> вт, 11 апр. 2017 г. в 19:03, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org >>>> <mailto: >>>>>>>>> dma...@apache.org>>: >>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Do you have sample code? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> — >>>>>>>>>> Denis >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 11, 2017, at 2:45 AM, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV < >>>>>>>>> alkuznetsov...@gmail.com <mailto:alkuznetsov...@gmail.com>> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, igniters! >>>>>>>>>>> While doing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4401 < >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4401> ticket i came >>>>>>>>>>> across the fact that cache querying returns null , while cache >>>> still >>>>>>>>> has >>>>>>>>>>> got entry. >>>>>>>>>>> Cache query : SELECT nameProp FROM EDUProp WHERE EDUId = 1 >>>>>>>>>>> Cache get operation : ignite().cache("eduPropCache").get(new >>>>>>>>> AffinityKey("1", >>>>>>>>>>> "1")) non-null >>>>>>>>>>> I cannot even imagine what could be wrong with it. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> *Best Regards,* >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> *Kuznetsov Aleksey* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Kuznetsov Aleksey >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Best Regards,* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Kuznetsov Aleksey* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Best Regards,* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Kuznetsov Aleksey* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> *Best Regards,* >>>>>> >>>>>> *Kuznetsov Aleksey* >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> *Best Regards,* >>>>> >>>>> *Kuznetsov Aleksey* >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Vladislav Pyatkov >>> >> -- >> >> *Best Regards,* >> >> *Kuznetsov Aleksey* >> > -- > > *Best Regards,* > > *Kuznetsov Aleksey*
