Sounds good to me. Other thoughts? — Denis
> On Apr 17, 2017, at 5:54 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[email protected]> wrote: > > How about we name it "default"? > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Denis Magda <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Folks, >> >> Are we sure we want to use ‘null’ as a name for the default policy if it’s >> not configured explicitly? Presently, >> MemoryConfiguration.getDefaultMemoryPolicyName >> suggests ‘null’ as a default one. >> >> I’m bringing this to your attention only because in AI 2.0 we’re trying to >> get rid of ‘null’ as a default for the cache name but, strangely, we keep >> following this criticized approache in the new API. >> >> — >> Denis >> >>
