Guys, I created a ticket for this as a subtask of IGNITE-3488 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3488>; you can find it IGNITE-5025 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5025>
Thanks, Sergey. On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:20 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 to "default". > > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Denis Magda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Sounds good to me. Other thoughts? > > > > — > > Denis > > > > > On Apr 17, 2017, at 5:54 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > How about we name it "default"? > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Denis Magda <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > >> Folks, > > >> > > >> Are we sure we want to use ‘null’ as a name for the default policy if > > it’s > > >> not configured explicitly? Presently, MemoryConfiguration. > > getDefaultMemoryPolicyName > > >> suggests ‘null’ as a default one. > > >> > > >> I’m bringing this to your attention only because in AI 2.0 we’re > trying > > to > > >> get rid of ‘null’ as a default for the cache name but, strangely, we > > keep > > >> following this criticized approache in the new API. > > >> > > >> — > > >> Denis > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > -- > Alexey Kuznetsov > GridGain Systems > www.gridgain.com >
