How long will it take to make the memory expandable? Can it be done for 2.0?

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 5:25 AM, Sergey Chugunov <sergey.chugu...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dmitriy,
>
> Replied in the ticket.
>
> Thanks,
> Sergey.
>
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Sergey,
> >
> > I have responded in the ticket. Can you please provide the current and
> the
> > proposed configuration examples?
> >
> > D.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:34 AM, Sergey Chugunov <
> > sergey.chugu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Guys,
> > >
> > > I created a ticket to implement these improvements, please take a look:
> > > IGNITE-5024 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5024>
> > >
> > > Besides employing the idea of allocation 80% of physical memory I'm
> also
> > > suggesting to introduce one more configuration property to specify
> > default
> > > MemoryPolicy's size in bytes without having to use verbose syntax of
> > > *memoryPolicyConfiguration
> > > *section.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts on this?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Sergey.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> > dsetrak...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Alexey Goncharuk <
> > > > alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I don't see why not, this is the way our tests are currently
> running.
> > > > > Anyways, we can think about efficient dynamic memory expansion in
> > 2.1,
> > > > this
> > > > > may be feasible if we free up some space in PageId to encode
> segment
> > > > > number. There is a ticket for this:
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4921
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Alexey, if the operating system is already handling this for us, I
> > don't
> > > > see a reason to do it manually.
> > > >
> > > > I also like what Denis and Semyon are proposing. However, I would not
> > > grab
> > > > the full free memory. How about 80% of the free memory?
> > > >
> > > > D.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to