This is a suggested fix: https://reviews.ignite.apache.org/ignite/review/IGNT-CR-269
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:15 PM, kukushal . <kukushkinale...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am fixing this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5966? > filter=-1 > Reviewing it with Vladimir Ozerov and Sergey Chugunov: > ---------------------------------- > ПРОБЛЕМА > “get” не работает для данных загруженных из cache store > ROOT CAUSE > There two separate type information stores: metadata store backed by the > file system and binary marshaller’s “type ID -> type name” store. Binary > marshaller use the latter one when deserialising objects. > BinaryObjectBuilderImpl used by the CacheJdbcPojoStore updates only > metadata store but not the marshaller mappings cache. Thus we get this > issue described in the ticket. > SOLUTION > Update BinaryObjectBuilderImpl to add type mapping to the marshaller cache. > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 1:41 AM, Valentin Kulichenko < > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Guys, >> >> Does anyone has ideas? >> >> -Val >> >> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Valentin Kulichenko < >> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Cross-posting to dev >>> >>> Folks, >>> >>> I'm confused by the issue discussed in this thread. >>> >>> Here is the scenario: >>> - Start server node with a cache with POJO store configured. There is >>> one type declared, read-through enabled. >>> - Start client node and execute get() for a key that exists in >>> underlying DB. >>> - During deserialization on the client, 'Requesting mapping from grid >>> failed for' exception is thrown. >>> >>> Specifying the type explicitly in BinaryConfiguration solves the issue, >>> and I think I understand technical reasons for this. But is this really >>> expected? Is it possible to fix the issue without requiring to provide this >>> configuration? >>> >>> I thought we do not require to provide types in configuration as long as >>> there is only one platform involved, am I wrong? If yes, we need to >>> identify scenarios when this documentation is required and document them. >>> >>> -Val >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:23 AM, franck102 <franck...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>>> My bad, here is the whole project. >>>> >>>> Franck ignite-binary-sample.zip >>>> <http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/file/n16158/ >>>> ignite-binary-sample.zip> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.705 >>>> 18.x6.nabble.com/Failure-to-deserialize-simple-model-object- >>>> tp15440p16158.html >>>> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Best regards, > Alexey > -- Best regards, Alexey
