Created a ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6575

-Val

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org> wrote:

> >>Second of all, it seems that we send a network message from primary node
> to
> local backup, which doesn't make much sense to me and looks like
> unnecessary performance overhead.
>
> This does not work. Remember CLOCK mode for atomic updates? We removed that
> mode. You need globally growing version to make it this way.
>
> As a solution I would suggest to update local copy before completing
> operation future, i.e. on primary node response processing. Val, please
> create a ticket if there is no objections (I would also check if we already
> have this ticket).
>
> Another point is that user can go to another backup (send compute closure)
> and find old value there. To my mind, it would be cool to have an
> opportunity to set write sync mode per operation using
> "withWriteSynchronization()" syntax.
>
> --Yakov
>

Reply via email to