Alex, Is that ticket about the eviction from the persistence layer? It's not obvious from the description.
Also, what do you mean by the "transfer of old entries to new storage" (how is it intended to work and what's a rationale if you're talking about pages movement from Ignite persistence to another)? -- Denis On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 12:06 AM, Alexey Goncharuk < [email protected]> wrote: > The ticket [1] is in patch available state looks good, the only thing left > there is to transfer old entries to new storage. I hope Andrey will have > time to finish this soon, so we can target the fix for 2.5. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5874 > > 2018-03-09 22:51 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <[email protected]>: > > > Val, > > > > I'd like to hear Alexey G. opinion on this? Alex, please chime in. > > > > In general, the more deployments the persistence will get the more demand > > we will see for that capability. Personally, I'd create a ticket for now > > and put it off to our backlog. > > > > -- > > Denis > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 3:43 AM, Dmitry Pavlov <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > As far as I know there is no plans. Denis please correct me if I'm > > wrong. > > > > > > > > But users found these or similar bugs, it seems we need to support > PDS > > > and > > > > TTL. > > > > > > > > > > We should either support it or throw a clear exception on startup > > clearly > > > stating that it is not. I suppose, it should be the latter for now. > > > Dmitriy, any chance you can file a ticket for it? > > > > > >
