I like idea of keeping simple system of modules, so +1 from me. Where optional libs (e.g Direct IO plugin) would be included, would it be core or optional?
чт, 15 мар. 2018 г. в 22:09, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > How big would be a final core module? > > Around 30M. Can be shrinked to ~15M if separate Visor and create it’s own > > package. > > > Guys, 30 vs 280M is a huuuuge difference. I would agree with Petr and > propose the simplest modular system: > > - core module that includes basic Ignite capabilities including SQL, > compute grid, service grid, k/v > - optional module hosts the rest - ML, streamers integration (kafka, > flink), kubernetes, etc. > > What do you think? > > -- > Denis > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:36 AM, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > *DEB package > > > > > > > On 15 Mar 2018, at 10:35, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Considering that DEV package for now is almost platform independent > (its > > a java application more or less), that package will work almost on any > > DEB-based linux, including but not limited to Ubuntu, Debian, etc. > > > The only restriction is existence of systemctl (systemd) service > manager > > — we are dependent on it. > > > > > > Thats why, for instance, our RPM repository is called simply ‘rpm’ and > > package has no arch or dist suffix — it will work on CentOS, RHEL, > Fedora, > > etc. with presence of aforementioned systemd. > > > > > > > > > > > >> On 15 Mar 2018, at 07:57, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Will Debian package work for Ubuntu? > > >> > > >> D. > > >> > > >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 9:52 PM, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> Not a problem, rather nuisance. Also, when we will move to official > > >>> repositories, there can be a problem from OS community. > > >>> > > >>> Concerning DEB packages — I plan to use RPM as base for DEB package > > build > > >>> (package layout / install scripts) for speeding up things and > excluding > > >>> possible duplication and desynchronisation, so its a matter of ’sit > > and do’ > > >>> rather then some technical research. Thats why I rose discussion > about > > >>> future package architecture, so that after agreement I'm be able to > > pack > > >>> both RPM and DEB identically. > > >>> > > >>> Yet, if you insist, I can create DEB package according to current RPM > > >>> layout in no time. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> On 15 Mar 2018, at 04:53, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org> > > >>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Peter, > > >>>> > > >>>> I don't think the package size of 280M is going to be a problem at > > all, > > >>> but > > >>>> what you are suggesting can be an improvement down the road. > > >>>> > > >>>> In the mean time, I think our top priority should be to provide > > packages > > >>>> for Debian and Ubuntu. Having only RPMs is not nearly enough. > > >>>> > > >>>> Agree? > > >>>> > > >>>> D. > > >>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 5:36 AM, vveider <mr.wei...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Hi, Igniters! > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Release 2.4 is almost there, at least binary part of it, so I'd > like > > to > > >>>>> move > > >>>>> forward to further improve and widen AI delivery through packages. > > >>>>> As of now, Apache Ignite ships in RPM package weighing about 280M+ > > and, > > >>> to > > >>>>> improve usability and significantly reduce required download > sizes, I > > >>>>> purpose that in 2.5 release we introduce splitted delivery as > > follows: > > >>>>> - CORE > > >>>>> - bin > > >>>>> - config > > >>>>> - libs (!optional) > > >>>>> - OPTIONAL LIBS > > >>>>> - BENCHMARKS > > >>>>> - DOCS (?) > > >>>>> - EXAMPLES > > >>>>> - .NET PLATFORM FILES > > >>>>> - C++ PLATFORM FILES > > >>>>> > > >>>>> This architecture, as I assume, will add flexibility (no reason to > > >>> download > > >>>>> all 280M+ of binaries where you are to run only core node > > functionality) > > >>>>> and > > >>>>> maintainability (you are in full control of what is installed on > your > > >>>>> system). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> After successful architecture choice, same scheme are planned to be > > >>> used in > > >>>>> DEB packages as well. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> WDYT? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Sent from: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/ > > >>>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > >
