On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 5:42 AM, Alexey Goncharuk <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Guys,
> After the review in Upsource the configuration parameter was renamed
> to txTimeoutOnPartMapSync, and it makes sense to me because PME is an
> implementation detail and it may change in future, partition map sync is a
> more abstract term. For the same reason I like this parameter being placed
> on transactions configuration - we do not have any parameters for PME, so
> the configuration property goes to an object which affects a user-exposed
> API.

AG, are we going to have any other timeouts on PME, like locks? If yes,
then I would still vote of adding PmeTimeout property.

Reply via email to