Guys, I've slightly modified public API javadoc as Denis Magda has suggested in PR review.
Please take a look. Pavel Tupitsyn, what about .NET stuff ? I provided all necessary information in ticket  Upsource link   https://reviews.ignite.apache.org/ignite/branch/PR%203624  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8075 пн, 9 апр. 2018 г. в 16:57, Alexey Goncharuk <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>: > I am not aware of any additional timeouts that we are willing to add in the > nearest future. > > 2018-04-09 16:01 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>: > > > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 5:42 AM, Alexey Goncharuk < > > alexey.goncha...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > > > Guys, > > > > > > After the review in Upsource the configuration parameter was renamed > > > to txTimeoutOnPartMapSync, and it makes sense to me because PME is an > > > implementation detail and it may change in future, partition map sync > is > > a > > > more abstract term. For the same reason I like this parameter being > > placed > > > on transactions configuration - we do not have any parameters for PME, > so > > > the configuration property goes to an object which affects a > user-exposed > > > API. > > > > > > > AG, are we going to have any other timeouts on PME, like locks? If yes, > > then I would still vote of adding PmeTimeout property. > > > -- Best regards, Alexei Scherbakov