Anton, Please do not use term "atomic cache" for system caches that hold internal data for atomic data structures. This is very confusing.
You are right, currently there is no logic that will validate cache configuration. It definitely should be fixed. And having configuration parameters encoded in cache name, like it is currently implemented for collections, is one of the most straightforward approaches. On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 4:19 PM, akurbanov <antkr....@gmail.com> wrote: > I've attached .java file to https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/browse/IGNITE-2096 > > Atomic references created with cacheMode=REPLICATED configuration are being > lost when first references are created with cacheMode=PARTITIONED, no > validation errors. > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/ > -- Best regards, Ilya