Dmitriy S, If it will be in the internal package, and only for internal usage, are you agree with changes?
пт, 11 мая 2018 г., 21:12 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>: > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 6:49 PM, Dmitriy Govorukhin < > dmitriy.govoruk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dmitriy S, > > > > It is not broke existing code, because for use this ability you must use > > decorator "withFairSycn()". > > > > What about the argument of Vladimir? > > > > Here is Vladimir's quote: > > > *This would also be helpful for transactional SQL as it would allow to > hide**network > latency. But there is a problem - deadlocks. We need to inform user* > *that this mode should be used with great care. * > > > I would rather not change anything instead of increasing the probability of > deadlocks. This was the main reason for the current behavior to begin with. > > In my view, if something is needed for the transactional SQL, please add it > internally. Let's not corrupt the public API by adding dangerous methods. > > D. >
