Dmitriy, Yakov is against the solution based on event sub-system >> I think that we should think about some other solution instead of altering >> event sub-system.
Also, I checked is there any chances to fix all the issues found by Yakov and see that solution becomes overcomplicated in that case. That's why I'm proposing this lightweight solution. As for me it's a good idea to have such validator since that's a common problem at huge deployments when more than one team have access to Ignite cluster and there is no other way to setup tx cretion rules. Yakov, Could you please share your thoughts on that? чт, 24 мая 2018 г. в 8:58, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>: > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 4:08 AM, Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Dmitriy, Yakov > > > > Are there any objections to updated design taking into account the > comments > > I provided? > > > > Anton, I do not like an additional validator. I think you can accomplish > the same with a transaction event. You just need to design it more cleanly, > incorporating the feedback from Yakov. >
