I hope you've misprinted here > I'm here to blame the author. We can blame code but never coders.
Please see https://discourse.pi-hole.net/faq - has absolutely nothing in common with Apache Guides, but says the same things. It is a practical necessity to maintain a friendly atmosphere. чт, 6 дек. 2018 г. в 10:31, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>: > Ivan. > > > 1. Accept the patch and bring an improvement to Ignite (and create a> > ticket for further investigation). > > I support this idea. > Do we create the tickets already? > > > Nikolay's patch [1] suggests a slightly different approach how to the > > same thing. And implementing that idea looks like a cheap refactoring. > > I don't agree with your term "cheap". > Do you think reducing copy paste code not worth it? > > I see a hundreds issues that bring copypasted code in the product(Ignite > and others). > I insist, that we shouldn't accept patches with it. > > I'm here to blame the author. > I want to improve this patch and make it easier to find all places with > NoOp handler to do the further investigation. > > В Чт, 06/12/2018 в 10:19 +0300, Павлухин Иван пишет: > > Guys, > > > > I asked what harm will applying the patch bring I have not got a > > direct answer. But I think I got some pain points: > > 1. Anton does not like that reasons why ~100 tests require noop > > handler are not clear. And might be several problems are covered > > there. > > 2. Nikolay suggests some code improvements. > > > > Nikolay's patch [1] suggests a slightly different approach how to the > > same thing. And implementing that idea looks like a cheap refactoring. > > But the idea of course could be discussed. Straight away I can suggest > > another slightly different trick [2]. > > > > Investigating why ~100 tests require noop handler could be costly. So, > > in that direction I see following options which can happen for sure: > > 1. Accept the patch and bring an improvement to Ignite (and create a > > ticket for further investigation). > > 2. Revert the patch and loose an improvement. > > > > One might say that there is an option "Revert the patch and then do it > > better" but I does not see anything (anyone) what can guarantee it. > > So, I personally prefer an option 1 against 2 because I believe that > > it is good if the system "can make a progress". > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/5584/files > > [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/5586/files > > ср, 5 дек. 2018 г. в 21:22, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>: > > > > > > Dmitriy. > > > > > > > The closest analog to Noop handler is mute of test failure. > > > > By this commit, we had unmuted (possible) failures in > ~50000-~100=~49900 > > > > > > tests, and we’re still concerned about style or minor details if no-op > was > > > copy-pasted, aren’t we? > > > > > > Can you explain this idea a bit more? > > > I don't understand what is unmuted by discussed commit. > > > > > > ср, 5 дек. 2018 г. в 20:40, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > Thanks, as an improvement to the code, this may be better. > > > > > > > > I can prepare a full patch for NoOp handler. > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > Anton Vinogradov, do you agree with this approach? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ср, 5 дек. 2018 г. в 20:33, Dmitriy Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > > Thanks, as an improvement to the code, this may be better. But > still, it > > > > > is > > > > > not a reason to revert. And Anton mentioned something with better > > > > > exception > > > > > handling/logging. Probably we will see an implementation as well. > > > > > > > > > > This case here is a big thing related to The Apache Way, - and I'll > > > > > explain > > > > > why it makes me switched into fight-mode - until we stop this > nonsense. If > > > > > PMCs (at least) are aware of patterns and anti-patterns in the > community, > > > > > we will succeed as a project much more as with (only) perfect code. > > > > > > > > > > The closest analog to Noop handler is mute of test failure. By this > > > > > commit, > > > > > we had unmuted (possible) failures in ~50000-~100=~49900 tests, > and we’re > > > > > still concerned about style or minor details if no-op was > copy-pasted, > > > > > aren’t we? > > > > > > > > > > To everyone arguing about the number of tests we are allowed to > have with > > > > > no-op: please visit this page > > > > > > > > > > > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&tab=mutedProblems&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__ > > > > > > > > > > It says: Muted tests: 3154. Are there any disagreements here? Why > there > > > > > are > > > > > no insistent disagreement/not happy PMCs with absolutely > unconditionally > > > > > muted failures? > > > > > > > > > > Any reason now to continue the discussion about reverting > absolutely > > > > > positive contribution into product stability from Dmitrii R.? > > > > > > > > > > Moreover, Dmitrii Ryabov is trying to solve odd mutes problem, as > well, to > > > > > locate mutes with links resolved issues in the TC Bot. Is he > deserved to > > > > > read denouncing comments about the contribution? I guess, no, > especially > > > > > if > > > > > the commenter is not going to help/contribute a better fix. > > > > > > > > > > This is now a paramount thing for me if people in this thread will > join > > > > > the > > > > > process or not. People may be not happy with some > decisions/code/style, > > > > > and > > > > > some people are more often unhappy than others. More you > contribute,- more > > > > > you can decide. If you don't contribute at all - I don't care too > much > > > > > about just opinions, I can accept facts. To provide facts we need > to do > > > > > deep research, how can someone know if the test should be no-op or > not > > > > > without deep analysis? > > > > > > > > > > Again, if someone comes to list and provide just negative > feedback, people > > > > > will stop writing here. Probably no-op was enabled without proper > > > > > discussion because of this, someone may be afraid of sharing this. > Result: > > > > > some of us knew it only now. > > > > > > > > > > Do you need to make Ignite quite toxic place to have an absolutely > perfect > > > > > code with just a few of arguing-resistant contributors? I believe > not, and > > > > > you don't need to be reminded 'community first principle'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ср, 5 дек. 2018 г. в 19:43, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy. > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we should avoid copy paste code instead of thinking > about Apache > > > > > > Way all the time :) > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway, I propose to return to the code! > > > > > > I think we should use some kind of marker base class for a cases > with > > > > > > NoOpHandler. > > > > > > This has several advantages, comparing with current > implementation: > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. No copy paste code > > > > > > 2. Reduce changes. > > > > > > 3. All usages of NoOpHandler can be easily found with IDE or grep > > > > > > > > > > search. > > > > > > > > > > > > I've prepared proof of concept pull request to demonstrate my > approach > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > I can go further and prepare full fix. > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/5584/files > > > > > > > > > > > > ср, 5 дек. 2018 г. в 18:29, Dmitriy Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Folks, let me explain one thing which is not related much to > fix > > > > > > > > > > itself, > > > > > > > but it is more about how we interact. If someone will just > come to the > > > > > > > > > > > > list > > > > > > > and say it is not good commit, it is a silly solution and say > to > > > > > > > > > > others > > > > > > to > > > > > > > rework these patches - it is a road to nowhere. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If someone sees the potential to make things better he or she > suggest > > > > > > > > > > > > help > > > > > > > (or commits patch). This is named do-ocracy, those who do can > make a > > > > > > > decision. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And this topic it is a perfect example of how do-ocracy should > (and > > > > > > > > > > > > should > > > > > > > not) work. We have a potentially hidden problem (we had it > before > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy > > > > > > > R. commit), I believe 3 or 7 tests may be found after > re-checks of > > > > > > > > > > tests. > > > > > > > Eventually, these tests will get their stop-node handler after > > > > > > > > > > revisiting > > > > > > > no-op test list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We have ~100 tests and several people who care. Anton, Andrew, > > > > > > > > > > Dmitrii & > > > > > > > Dmitriy, Nikolay, probably Ed, and we have 100/6 = 18 tests to > double > > > > > > > > > > > > check > > > > > > > for each contributor. We can make things better if we go > together. And > > > > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > is how a community works. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If someone just come to list to criticize and enforces someone > else > > > > > > > > > > to do > > > > > > > all things, he or she probably don't want to improve project > code but > > > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > other goals. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ср, 5 дек. 2018 г. в 18:08, Andrey Kuznetsov < > stku...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I can see from the above discussion, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tests in these classes check fail cases when we expect > critical > > > > > > > > > > > > > > failure > > > > > > > > like node stop or exception thrown > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, this copy-n-paste-style change is caused by the > imperfect logic > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > existing tests, that should be reworked in more robust way, > e.g. > > > > > > > > > > using > > > > > > > > custom failure handlers. Dmitrii just revealed the existing > flaws, > > > > > > > > > > IMO. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ср, 5 дек. 2018 г. в 17:54, Nikolay Izhikov < > nizhi...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, Igniters. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm agree with Anton Vinogradov. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we should avoid commits like [1] > > > > > > > > > Copy paste coding style is well known anti pattern. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Don't we have another option to do same fix with better > styling? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Accepting such patches leads to the further tickets to > cleanup > > > > > > > > > > mess > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > patches brings to the code base. > > > > > > > > > Example of cleanup [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's take a significant amount of my and Maxim time to > made and > > > > > > > > > > > > review > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > cleanup patch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We shouldn't accept patch with copy paste "improvements". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I really like your perfectionism > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's not about perfectionism it's about keeping code base > clean. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And I'm going to rollback changes in case arguments will > not be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > provided. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 to rollback and rework this commit. > > > > > > > > > At least, we should reduce copy paste code. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/b94a3c2fe3a272a31fad62b80505d16f87eab2dd > > > > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/eb8038f65285559c5424eba2882b0de0583ea7af > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ср, 5 дек. 2018 г. в 17:28, Anton Vinogradov < > a...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrey, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But why should we make all things perfect > > > > > > > > > > > > in a single fix? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I said, I'm ok in case someone ready to continue :) > > > > > > > > > > But, we should avoid such over-copy-pasted commits in the > > > > > > > > > > future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 5:13 PM Andrey Mashenkov < > > > > > > > > > > andrey.mashen...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitry, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do we have TC run results for the PR before massive > failure > > > > > > > > > > > > handler > > > > > > > > > > > fallbacks were added? > > > > > > > > > > > Let's create a ticket to investigate possibility of > using any > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > meaningful > > > > > > > > > > > failure handler for such tests with TC report attached. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 4:41 PM Anton Vinogradov < > > > > > > > > > > a...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's ok in case someone ready to do this (get rid of > all > > > > > > > > > > no-op > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > explain > > > > > > > > > > > > why it's a better choice). > > > > > > > > > > > > Explicit confirmation required. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, only rollback is an option. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 4:29 PM Dmitriy Pavlov < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dpav...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anton, if you care enough here will you try to > research a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > couple > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > these > > > > > > > > > > > > > tests? Or you are asking others to do things for > you, > > > > > > > > > > aren't > > > > > > > you? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I like idea from Andrew to create ticket and check > these > > > > > > > > > > test > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > keep > > > > > > > > > > > > > moving towards 0....10 tests with noop. It is easy > to > > > > > > > > > > locate > > > > > > > > these > > > > > > > > > > > > > overridden method now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So threat this change as contributed mechanism for > failing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tests. > > > > > > > > > Is > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok > > > > > > > > > > > > > for you? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ср, 5 дек. 2018 г., 15:59 Anton Vinogradov < > a...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I didn't get. What is the problem in saving > No-Op for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > several > > > > > > > > > > > tests? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > should we keep No-Op for all? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Several (less than 10) is ok to me with the > proper > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation > > > > > > > > > why > > > > > > > > > > > > tests > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fail and why no-op is a better choice. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 100+++ copy-pasted no-op handlers are not ok! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't ask you to re-do this change, I ask > to > > > > > > > > > > > > demonstrate > > > > > > > > any > > > > > > > > > > > > better > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > approach for tests which intentionally > activate > > > > > > > > > > failure > > > > > > > > > handler. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You asking me to provide approach without > explanation > > > > > > > > > > why > > > > > > > tests > > > > > > > > > > fail > > > > > > > > > > > > > > without no-op handler? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My approach is to rollback this fix, reopen the > issue > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > make > > > > > > > > > > > > everything > > > > > > > > > > > > > > properly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Make a proper investigation first. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Finally, let's stop this game. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We have to discuss the reasons why tests fail. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In case no-one checked "why" before the fix was > merged > > > > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > able > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > start doing this after rollback. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 3:49 PM Eduard Shangareev > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > eduard.shangar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Guys, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I didn't get. What is the problem in saving > No-Op for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > several > > > > > > > > > > > tests? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > should we keep No-Op for all? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 3:20 PM Павлухин Иван < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vololo...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anton, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes I meant that patch. And I would like to > respell > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > name > > > > > > > > > > > "massive > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no-op handler restore" to "use no-op failure > handler > > > > > > > > > > > > only > > > > > > > > > where > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > assumed". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ср, 5 дек. 2018 г. в 15:09, Dmitriy Pavlov < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dpav...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitrii Ryabov explained these tests are > > > > > > > > > > perfectly ok > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > > > > failures > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > these tests do test failures. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anton, there is no reason to revert other's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contributions > > > > > > > > > > > because > > > > > > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > know > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how to do things better. A lot of people > can do > > > > > > > > > > > > things > > > > > > > > > better > > > > > > > > > > > > than > > > > > > > > > > > > > > me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Should we revert everything I've > contributed? I > > > > > > > > > > hope > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > no. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you can do things better, just commit > further > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > improvements. > > > > > > > > > > > > And > > > > > > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be happy if you contribute some > improvements > > > > > > > > > > later. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you would like to revert by veto, please > > > > > > > > > > justify > > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > > > intent. > > > > > > > > > > > > If > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would discuss it with all community, > please feel > > > > > > > > > > free > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > convince > > > > > > > > > > > > > me > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > others. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ср, 5 дек. 2018 г. в 14:53, Павлухин Иван < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vololo...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Anton, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you please summarize what does > > > > > > > > > > aforementioned > > > > > > > > patch > > > > > > > > > > > made > > > > > > > > > > > > > > really > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > worse? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I see, the patch added a very good > thing -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > meaningful > > > > > > > > > > > > failure > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > handler in tests. And I think it is > really > > > > > > > > > > > > important. > > > > > > > > But > > > > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > harm and does it overweight positive > result? And > > > > > > > > > > > > why? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ср, 5 дек. 2018 г. в 14:03, Anton > Vinogradov < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's an incorrect idea to ask me to > provide > > > > > > > > > > PR > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > fix > > > > > > > > > > > > > these > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > test > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > properly since I'm not an author or > reviewer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, I, as a community member, ask you > to > > > > > > > > > > explain > > > > > > > > what > > > > > > > > > > > > problems > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fix > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fixes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In case you're not able to provide the > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rollback > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > changes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's not acceptable to merge fix of > unknown > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problems. > > > > > > > > > > At > > > > > > > > > > > > > least, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > such > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "100 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > times copy-paste fix". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please provide the explanation of the > problem > > > > > > > > > > > > we're > > > > > > > > > > fixing > > > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > each > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > test > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > group. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P.s. My goal is not to rollback > something, > > > > > > > > > > but to > > > > > > > > > prevent > > > > > > > > > > > > merge > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > without > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > understanding what it fixes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 1:40 PM Dmitriy > Pavlov > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dpav...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anton, please provide PR to demo > your idea. > > > > > > > > > > > > Code > > > > > > > > > speaks > > > > > > > > > > > > > louder > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > than > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > words > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sometimes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No reason to revert a contribution if > > > > > > > > > > someone > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > an > > > > > > > > > > > idea, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is not > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clear for others. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Again, we should discuss not Dmitrii > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contribution, > > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > initial > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > selection of no-op. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you will do a test failure fixes > later > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > set > > > > > > > > > > > > > new > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > handler > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > StopNode+FailTest as the only option > - ok > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ср, 5 дек. 2018 г. в 13:35, Anton > > > > > > > > > > Vinogradov < > > > > > > > > > > > > a...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I said before, these changes > allow > > > > > > > > > > tests > > > > > > to > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > > successful > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > case > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > unexpected failures. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's not acceptable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As a reviewer, you have to be > ready to > > > > > > > > > > > > provide > > > > > > > > > > > arguments > > > > > > > > > > > > > why > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > these > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tests > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have to be fixed this way and what > was the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem, > > > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > > case > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > merged > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > such > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > changes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's unacceptable to hide issues > > > > > > > > > > instead of > > > > > > > > fix. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, I ask you, as a reviewer, to > provide > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > explanation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What problem and at what test we > solved by > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no-op > > > > > > > > > > > handler. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And I'm going to rollback changes > in case > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > arguments > > > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > provided. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 1:10 PM > Dmitriy > > > > > > > > > > > > Pavlov < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dpav...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will not do any rollback > because > > > > > > > > > > changes > > > > > > > make > > > > > > > > > > tests > > > > > > > > > > > > > > better. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > attention that no-op became > default long > > > > > > > > > > > > time > > > > > > > > > ago. > > > > > > > > > > > > Please > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discuss > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > selection with authors of the > previous > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commit. > > > > > > > > > New > > > > > > > > > > > > commit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > changes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NoOp->FailTest+stopNode. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please provide a PR to > demonstrate your > > > > > > > > > > > > idea > > > > > > > > how > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > transfer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > handle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > exceptions. I believe it will > not work > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > fail > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > handler is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > activated from any pool inside a > node. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ср, 5 дек. 2018 г. в 13:05, Anton > > > > > > > > > > > > Vinogradov > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which code block will do a > throw? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Depends on the test. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Looks like we make the *bad > *test even > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *worse*. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's not a correct fix. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In case you expect failure you > have to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > check > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expectation > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > inside > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > special handler. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to ask you to > rollback these > > > > > > > > > > > > > > changes > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > replace > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > them > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > correct > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fixes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 12:39 > PM Andrey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mashenkov > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > andrey.mashen...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitri, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The meaningful failure > handler as a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > default > > > > > > > > > one > > > > > > > > > > > > looks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reasonable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But what is the reason to > fallback > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > noop > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > 100+ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > test? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does it means these test > become > > > > > > > > > > failed > > > > > > > > after > > > > > > > > > > > > changing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > default > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > failure > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > handler? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If so, let's create a ticket > (may be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > umbrella) > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > investigate > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fix > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I see 100+ touched files in > PR and > > > > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > them > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > abstract > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > classes, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we have much more affected > tests. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Seems, most of failover test > doesn't > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expects > > > > > > > > > if > > > > > > > > > > > any > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > critical > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > internal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > issue > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > occur and there is no need to > > > > > > > > > > fallback > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > noop. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Other test should set custom > failure > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > handler > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > detect > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expected > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > failures > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if grid hanging simulation > is needed > > > > > > > > > > > > (to > > > > > > > > keep > > > > > > > > > > > > hanged > > > > > > > > > > > > > > grid > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > under > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > control). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 12:16 > PM > > > > > > > > > > Anton > > > > > > > > > > Vinogradov > > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitrii, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No-op means "hide any > problem", > > > > > > > > > > so, > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > lose > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > guarantees. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you please share some > > > > > > > > > > examples > > > > > > > > where > > > > > > > > > > > > "no-op" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > better > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > than > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "strict > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > try-catch with a check"? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at > 11:37 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitrii > > > > > > > > > > Ryabov > > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > somefire...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anton, I think wrapping > every > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > disconnecting > > > > > > > > > > > > node > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > try-catch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > less readable than no-op > > > > > > > > > > handler. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ср, 5 дек. 2018 г., 9:26 > Dmitriy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pavlov > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dpav...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Folks let me remind > you that > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitry > > > > > > > > > > changed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > default > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ALL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tests > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > noop > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to a meaningful > handler. So we > > > > > > > > > > > > > > should > > > > > > > > > > start > > > > > > > > > > > > > every > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > message > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > here > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > saying > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thank you to Dmitry. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please review > remaining tests > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > remove > > > > > > > > > > > noop > > > > > > > > > > > > > > where > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > possible. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > вт, 4 дек. 2018 г., > 23:48 > > > > > > > > > > Andrey > > > > > > > > > > Mashenkov > > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > andrey.mashen...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Really, why noop? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you expect failure > > > > > > > > > > handler > > > > > > > > should > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > triggered, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > override > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > default > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > one and rise some > flag, > > > > > > > > > > which > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > checked > > > > > > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > test. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This will make test > clearer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With noop, you'll get > > > > > > > > > > previous > > > > > > > > > unwanted > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > behavior, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that you > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > trying > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > improve, isnt'it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4 дек. 2018 г. 23:25 > > > > > > > > > > > > пользователь > > > > > > > > > > "Anton > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vinogradov" < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > написал: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And you have to > check the > > > > > > > > > > > > reason > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > failure > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > inside > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > try-catch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > block, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > course. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In case found not > equals to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expected > > > > > > > > > > then > > > > > > > > > > > > > test > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > should > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rethrow > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > exception. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > вт, 4 дек. 2018 г. в > 23:21, > > > > > > > > > > > > Anton > > > > > > > > > > > > Vinogradov > > > > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitrii, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The solution is > not clear > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In case you expect > the > > > > > > > > > > > > failure > > > > > > > > > then a > > > > > > > > > > > > > correct > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > case > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrap > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > try-catch block > instead of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no-op > > > > > > > > > > > failure > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > handler > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > usage. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > вт, 4 дек. 2018 г. > в > > > > > > > > > > 21:41, > > > > > > > > Dmitrii > > > > > > > > > > > > Ryabov > > > > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > somefire...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anton, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tests in these > classes > > > > > > > > > > check > > > > > > > > fail > > > > > > > > > > > cases > > > > > > > > > > > > > when > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expect > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > critical > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > failure like > node stop or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > exception > > > > > > > > > > > > > thrown. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Such > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tests > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > trigger > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > failure > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > handler and it > fails test > > > > > > > > > > > > when > > > > > > > > > > > > everything > > > > > > > > > > > > > > goes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > should > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > go. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > why we need > no-op handler > > > > > > > > > > > > > > here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > вт, 4 дек. 2018 > г. в > > > > > > > > > > 20:06, > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pavlov < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dpav...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, if you > find in > > > > > > > > > > any of > > > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > > > tests > > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does't > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > need > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > an > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > old > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > value > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > handler > (=NoOp), feel > > > > > > > > > > free > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > remove > > > > > > > > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > вт, 4 дек. > 2018 г. в > > > > > > > > > > > > 20:02, > > > > > > > > > Anton > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vinogradov < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitrii, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you > please > > > > > > > > > > explain > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > reason > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > explicit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 100+ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NoOpFailureHandlers? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > вт, 4 дек. > 2018 г. в > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 19:12, > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitrii > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ryabov < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > somefire...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > Igniters! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Today the > test > > > > > > > > > > > > > > framework's > > > > > > > > > > > default > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no-op > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > failure > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > handler > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > changed to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > handler, > which > > > > > > > > > > stops > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > node > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fails > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > test. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Over 100 > tests kept > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no-op > > > > > > > > > > > failure > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > handler > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > overrided > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > `getFailureHandler()` > > > > > > > > > method. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you'll > found a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > problem > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > > > > something > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > unexpected > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > write > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > here > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ticket [1]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8227 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrey V. Mashenkov > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ivan Pavlukhin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ivan Pavlukhin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > Andrey V. Mashenkov > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > Andrey Kuznetsov. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
