Thanks??
Our team is evaluating ignite now, I am going through the cpp source code these 
days.




------------------ Original ------------------
From: Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org>
Date: ????,1?? 23,2019 6:35 ????
To: dev <dev@ignite.apache.org>
Subject: Re: IGNITE-8283 CPP: Implement 'varint' solution to be configurable 
via BinaryConfiguration



Great,

Try focussing on it first. Also, do not hesitate to contact me if you have
any questions about preparing your development environment - it may be
a little bit difficult now, through I'm working on it's improvement.

Best Regards,
Igor


On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 3:24 AM ppenguin <prehistoricpeng...@qq.com> wrote:

> Hi??so now I will focus on the JNI approach, thanks for the explanation.
>
>
> ????????iPhone
>
> ------------------ Original ------------------
> From: Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org>
> Date: ????,1?? 23,2019 1:15 ????
> To: dev <dev@ignite.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: IGNITE-8283 CPP: Implement 'varint' solution to be
> configurable via BinaryConfiguration
>
>
>
> Yes, we need to add it to all thin clients, actually, and to thin
> protocol specification.
>
> On the second thought, we need to implement second approach
> anyway, as Ignite can be configured with XML. So, I'd stopped on
> the second approach for now, as we will need it in any way.
> Best Regards,
> Igor
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 6:19 PM ppenguin <prehistoricpeng...@qq.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi??Do we need to add it into the thin cpp client too?If so, I think we??d
> > better choose the first method,then we can reuse the code.
> >
> >
> > ------------------ Original ------------------
> > From: Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org>
> > Date: ????,1?? 21,2019 11:19 ????
> > To: dev <dev@ignite.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: IGNITE-8283 CPP: Implement 'varint' solution to be
> > configurable via BinaryConfiguration
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The obvious solution here is to add IgniteConfiguration class for C++,
> but
> > it looks like not an easy task.
> >
> > There is another solution which is more easy to implement: it is to add
> > call
> > to Java code, something like "isVarintActive()", which is going to be
> > called
> > on node startup.
> > Best Regards,
> > Igor
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 1:40 PM ppenguin <prehistoricpeng...@qq.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Igniters,
> > >
> > > I'am beginning with this task. Now the c++ implementation lacks some
> > parts
> > > that existed in Java and C#, so the task seems a little complex. I want
> > to
> > > discuss the details here.

Reply via email to