Also, remember to merge code from Ignite's master to your branch often as I'm making some massive changes in C++ codebase currently.
Best Regards, Igor On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 1:41 PM prehistoricpenguin < [email protected]> wrote: > Thanks， > Our team is evaluating ignite now, I am going through the cpp source code > these days. > > > > > ------------------ Original ------------------ > From: Igor Sapego <[email protected]> > Date: 周三,1月 23,2019 6:35 下午 > To: dev <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: IGNITE-8283 CPP: Implement 'varint' solution to be > configurable via BinaryConfiguration > > > > Great, > > Try focussing on it first. Also, do not hesitate to contact me if you have > any questions about preparing your development environment - it may be > a little bit difficult now, through I'm working on it's improvement. > Best Regards, > Igor > > > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 3:24 AM ppenguin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi，so now I will focus on the JNI approach, thanks for the explanation. > > > > > > 发自我的iPhone > > > > ------------------ Original ------------------ > > From: Igor Sapego <[email protected]> > > Date: 周三,1月 23,2019 1:15 上午 > > To: dev <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: IGNITE-8283 CPP: Implement 'varint' solution to be > > configurable via BinaryConfiguration > > > > > > > > Yes, we need to add it to all thin clients, actually, and to thin > > protocol specification. > > > > On the second thought, we need to implement second approach > > anyway, as Ignite can be configured with XML. So, I'd stopped on > > the second approach for now, as we will need it in any way. > > Best Regards, > > Igor > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 6:19 PM ppenguin <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi，Do we need to add it into the thin cpp client too?If so, I think > we’d > > > better choose the first method,then we can reuse the code. > > > > > > > > > ------------------ Original ------------------ > > > From: Igor Sapego <[email protected]> > > > Date: 周一,1月 21,2019 11:19 下午 > > > To: dev <[email protected]> > > > Subject: Re: IGNITE-8283 CPP: Implement 'varint' solution to be > > > configurable via BinaryConfiguration > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > The obvious solution here is to add IgniteConfiguration class for C++, > > but > > > it looks like not an easy task. > > > > > > There is another solution which is more easy to implement: it is to add > > > call > > > to Java code, something like "isVarintActive()", which is going to be > > > called > > > on node startup. > > > Best Regards, > > > Igor > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 1:40 PM ppenguin <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > I'am beginning with this task. Now the c++ implementation lacks some > > > parts > > > > that existed in Java and C#, so the task seems a little complex. I > want > > > to > > > > discuss the details here.
