Ilya, I checked your test on a revision before "limit" and it fails there as well. Could you please double check?
пн, 2 дек. 2019 г. в 13:21, Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>: > > Hello! > > The problem is NOT specific to range queries. Range queries were broken > previously and they are broken now, but now even a simple "token in field > with limit" returns duplicates. > > Before limits were introduced, any tested use cases were unaffected by > duplicates, but now they are. > > Regards, > -- > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > пн, 2 дек. 2019 г. в 12:23, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com>: > > > And is the problem specific to range queries or not? > > > > пн, 2 дек. 2019 г. в 11:12, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > Yuriy, > > > > > > Thank you for investigating the problem [1]. Still cannot realize how > > > the problem relates to introduced "limit"? Is it right that there were > > > no duplicates before "limit" support? After that support is introduced > > > are only limited queries contain duplicates, or unlimited, or both? > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12401 > > > > > > чт, 28 нояб. 2019 г. в 18:30, Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com > > >: > > > > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > > > I have just found what I consider a major regression in Text Queries: > > it > > > > seems to me that text queries with limits will return same key-value > > > > entries multiple times. > > > > > > > > Please check the issue > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12401 > > > > and corresponding build > > > > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewQueued.html?itemId=4799634 > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > -- > > > > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > Ivan Pavlukhin > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Ivan Pavlukhin > > -- Best regards, Ivan Pavlukhin
