Hi,

I observed that we already have release 2.8.1 branch
https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1

In that case we should be ok to merge these 2 open PRs in master to make it
available for 2.9.0 release.

https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7240
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7227

Can you please review and confirm?

Regards,
Saikat

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:19 AM Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org> wrote:

> Igniters,
>
> I support Nikolay Izhikov as the release manager of 2.8.1 Apache
> Ignite release. Since no one else of committers, PMCs expressed a
> desire to lead this release I think we can close this question and
> focus on the release scope and dates.
>
>
> Ivan,
>
> You helped me configuring TC.Bot that time, can you please help again
> and set `ignite-2.8.1` branch for guard under TC.Bot [1]? We should
> start collecting TC statistics for the release branch as early as
> possible.
>
>
> [1] https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
>
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:48, Taras Ledkov <tled...@gridgain.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I propose to add the issue [1] related to SQL query execution to this
> scope.
> >
> > We had omitted this case and Ignite 2.8 contains serious SQL issue:
> > cursor of a local query is not thread-safe.
> > It is root cause of several SQL issue, e.g. JDBC thin client cannot
> > execute query  from replicated cache,
> > PME may hang after execute such queries from JDBC thin, etc.
> >
> > [1]. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12800
> >
> > On 19.03.2020 17:52, Denis Magda wrote:
> > > Igniters,
> > >
> > > As long as 2.8.1 is inevitable and we already keep adding critical
> issues
> > > to the working queue, let's settle on the release time frames and
> decide
> > > who will be a release manager. This is the time proposed by Maxim and,
> > > personally, I concur with such a schedule:
> > >
> > >     - Scope Freeze: April 15, 2020
> > >     - Code Freeze: April 22, 2020
> > >     - Voting Date: April 27, 2020
> > >     - Release Date: May 1, 2020
> > >
> > > Do we agree on this time? Is there anybody who ready to drive the
> release
> > > as a release manager?
> > >
> > > -
> > > Denis
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:50 AM Sergey Antonov <
> antonovserge...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Folks,
> > >>
> > >> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12774 Transaction hangs after too many
> open
> > >> files NIO exception [1] to ignite-2.8.1 scope.
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12774
> > >>
> > >> ср, 18 мар. 2020 г. в 16:53, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>:
> > >>
> > >>> Folks,
> > >>>
> > >>> Can we add ignite-2.8.1 [2] branch under TC.Bot protection [1]?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> [1] https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
> > >>> [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 16:32, Alexey Goncharuk
> > >>> <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>> Folks,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I've walked through all the commits to master since 2.8 branch was
> cut
> > >>> and
> > >>>> filtered some tickets that in my opinion are worth including to
> 2.8.1
> > >>>> release below (note that they are ready end the effort of including
> > >> them
> > >>> to
> > >>>> the release should be low as long as there are no implicit
> dependencies
> > >>>> between tickets). Please share your opinion on whether we should
> > >> include
> > >>>> them to the 2.8.1.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation refactoring
> > >>>> IGNITE-12590 MERGE INTO query is failing on Ignite client node
> > >>>> IGNITE-12671 Update of partition's states can stuck when rebalance
> > >>>> completed during exchange
> > >>>> IGNITE-11798 Memory leak on unstable topology caused by partition
> > >>>> reservation
> > >>>> IGNITE-12665 SQL: Potential race on MapResult close.
> > >>>> IGNITE-12605 Historical (WAL) rebalance can start on a cleared
> > >> partition
> > >>> if
> > >>>> some baseline node leaves the cluster and then joins back.
> > >>>> IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl
> may
> > >>>> accumulate a huge number of eviction callbacks
> > >>>> IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record type in marshalled mode
> > >>> during
> > >>>> iteration
> > >>>> IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause NullPointerException during IO
> > >> message
> > >>>> processing if security is enabled
> > >>>> IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a historical one
> > >>>> IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of last server event can be
> > >> wiped
> > >>>> from history
> > >>>> IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown by ExchangeLatchManager
> > >>> during
> > >>>> cache creation
> > >>>> IGNITE-11797 Fix consistency issues for atomic and mixed tx-atomic
> > >> cache
> > >>>> groups.
> > >>>> IGNITE-12557 Destroy of big cache which is not only cache in cache
> > >> group
> > >>>> causes IgniteOOME
> > >>>> IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state when non-indexed columns
> > >> are
> > >>>> dropped
> > >>>> IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a BinaryObject's field
> > >>>> IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node by consistent ID
> > >>>> IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in WAL doesn't work with
> > >> segment
> > >>>> compaction
> > >>>> IGNITE-12548 Possible tx desync during recovery on near node left.
> > >>>> IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by other nodes switch their
> state
> > >>> to
> > >>>> MOVING due to counter difference on node join.
> > >>>> IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition is evicted then owned
> > >> again
> > >>>> and historically rebalanced
> > >>>> IGNITE-12536 Inconsistency between cache data and indexes when cache
> > >>>> operation is interrupted
> > >>>> IGNITE-12403 Throttle page difference output in PageMemoryTracker
> > >>>> IGNITE-12523 Continuously generated thread dumps in failure
> processor
> > >>> slow
> > >>>> down the whole system
> > >>>> IGNITE-12489 Error during purges by expiration: Unknown page type
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> BR, Sergey Antonov
> > >>
> > --
> > Taras Ledkov
> > Mail-To: tled...@gridgain.com
> >
>

Reply via email to