Hello, Igniters.

I’m started to work on this 2.8.1 release [1] 

Resolved issues for release(28) - [2]
Unresolved issues for release(30) - [3]

My next step: 

1. I want to double-check that all commits for the tickets with the 
fixVersion=2.8.1 presented in corresponding release branch.
And cherry-pick losted changes.

2. I want to reduce the scope of the release and exclude tickets that is not 
ready for now.

As you may know, 2.8.1 is a bug fix release.
Therefore, I think we can wait only for a blocker issues.

What do you think?

[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
[2] 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20and%20status%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
[3] 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20%20and%20status%20not%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20


> 8 апр. 2020 г., в 20:15, Вячеслав Коптилин <slava.kopti...@gmail.com> 
> написал(а):
> 
> Folks,
> 
> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12805 "NullPointerException on node restart
> when 3rd party persistence and Ignite native persistence are used" to
> ignite-2.8.1 scope.
> 
> [1]  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12805
> 
> Thanks,
> S.
> 
> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 19:57, Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>:
> 
>> Hello!
>> 
>> Done!
>> 
>> Regards,
>> --
>> Ilya Kasnacheev
>> 
>> 
>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 12:31, Sergey <macrerg...@gmail.com>:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I'm proposing to add
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12549  (fix iterators/scan
>>> queries for replicated caches)
>>> to 2.8.1.
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Sergey Kosarev.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> вс, 5 апр. 2020 г. в 01:22, Saikat Maitra <saikat.mai...@gmail.com>:
>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I observed that we already have release 2.8.1 branch
>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
>>>> 
>>>> In that case we should be ok to merge these 2 open PRs in master to
>> make
>>> it
>>>> available for 2.9.0 release.
>>>> 
>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7240
>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7227
>>>> 
>>>> Can you please review and confirm?
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Saikat
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:19 AM Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I support Nikolay Izhikov as the release manager of 2.8.1 Apache
>>>>> Ignite release. Since no one else of committers, PMCs expressed a
>>>>> desire to lead this release I think we can close this question and
>>>>> focus on the release scope and dates.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ivan,
>>>>> 
>>>>> You helped me configuring TC.Bot that time, can you please help again
>>>>> and set `ignite-2.8.1` branch for guard under TC.Bot [1]? We should
>>>>> start collecting TC statistics for the release branch as early as
>>>>> possible.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> [1] https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:48, Taras Ledkov <tled...@gridgain.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I propose to add the issue [1] related to SQL query execution to
>> this
>>>>> scope.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We had omitted this case and Ignite 2.8 contains serious SQL issue:
>>>>>> cursor of a local query is not thread-safe.
>>>>>> It is root cause of several SQL issue, e.g. JDBC thin client cannot
>>>>>> execute query  from replicated cache,
>>>>>> PME may hang after execute such queries from JDBC thin, etc.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [1]. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12800
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 19.03.2020 17:52, Denis Magda wrote:
>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> As long as 2.8.1 is inevitable and we already keep adding
>> critical
>>>>> issues
>>>>>>> to the working queue, let's settle on the release time frames and
>>>>> decide
>>>>>>> who will be a release manager. This is the time proposed by Maxim
>>>> and,
>>>>>>> personally, I concur with such a schedule:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>    - Scope Freeze: April 15, 2020
>>>>>>>    - Code Freeze: April 22, 2020
>>>>>>>    - Voting Date: April 27, 2020
>>>>>>>    - Release Date: May 1, 2020
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Do we agree on this time? Is there anybody who ready to drive the
>>>>> release
>>>>>>> as a release manager?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:50 AM Sergey Antonov <
>>>>> antonovserge...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12774 Transaction hangs after too
>>> many
>>>>> open
>>>>>>>> files NIO exception [1] to ignite-2.8.1 scope.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12774
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ср, 18 мар. 2020 г. в 16:53, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org
>>> :
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Can we add ignite-2.8.1 [2] branch under TC.Bot protection [1]?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> [1] https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
>>>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 16:32, Alexey Goncharuk
>>>>>>>>> <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I've walked through all the commits to master since 2.8 branch
>>> was
>>>>> cut
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> filtered some tickets that in my opinion are worth including
>> to
>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>> release below (note that they are ready end the effort of
>>>> including
>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> the release should be low as long as there are no implicit
>>>>> dependencies
>>>>>>>>>> between tickets). Please share your opinion on whether we
>> should
>>>>>>>> include
>>>>>>>>>> them to the 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation refactoring
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12590 MERGE INTO query is failing on Ignite client node
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12671 Update of partition's states can stuck when
>>> rebalance
>>>>>>>>>> completed during exchange
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11798 Memory leak on unstable topology caused by
>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>> reservation
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12665 SQL: Potential race on MapResult close.
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12605 Historical (WAL) rebalance can start on a cleared
>>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>> some baseline node leaves the cluster and then joins back.
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl
>>>>> may
>>>>>>>>>> accumulate a huge number of eviction callbacks
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record type in marshalled
>>>> mode
>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>> iteration
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause NullPointerException during
>> IO
>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>> processing if security is enabled
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a historical one
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of last server event
>> can
>>>> be
>>>>>>>> wiped
>>>>>>>>>> from history
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown by
>>>> ExchangeLatchManager
>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>> cache creation
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11797 Fix consistency issues for atomic and mixed
>>> tx-atomic
>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>> groups.
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12557 Destroy of big cache which is not only cache in
>>> cache
>>>>>>>> group
>>>>>>>>>> causes IgniteOOME
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state when non-indexed
>>>> columns
>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>> dropped
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a BinaryObject's
>> field
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node by consistent ID
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in WAL doesn't work
>>> with
>>>>>>>> segment
>>>>>>>>>> compaction
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12548 Possible tx desync during recovery on near node
>>> left.
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by other nodes switch
>>> their
>>>>> state
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> MOVING due to counter difference on node join.
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition is evicted then
>>> owned
>>>>>>>> again
>>>>>>>>>> and historically rebalanced
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12536 Inconsistency between cache data and indexes when
>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>> operation is interrupted
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12403 Throttle page difference output in
>>> PageMemoryTracker
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12523 Continuously generated thread dumps in failure
>>>>> processor
>>>>>>>>> slow
>>>>>>>>>> down the whole system
>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12489 Error during purges by expiration: Unknown page
>>> type
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> BR, Sergey Antonov
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
>>>>>> Mail-To: tled...@gridgain.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to