Hi Igniters, I'm continuing with IGNITE-12756 PR creation. It turned out that we need 3 more cherry-picks to avoid massive code changes. Tests started failing after my initial attempt to create that PR.
So, in total I have PR with 6 commits in it. Some of them fix components and tests for them, others are required for new tests to compile and run without changes in 2.8.1 branch. RunAll is in progress now and I'll reply with news if I have any. Andrey Gura, Nikolay Izhikov, are you OK with 3 more commits in the scope? If you don't, then I won't be able to port IGNITE-12756 to 2.8.1 properly by myself, I guess it would be easier to reimplement it from the scratch. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568 [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12285 [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12668 [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12682 [7] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708 вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 19:36, Pavel Pereslegin <xxt...@gmail.com>: > Hello, Nikolay. > > This has been fixed by increasing the test timeout in IGNITE-12683 [1][2]. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12683 > [2] > https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/bf394a77e1de6432e493eb2818243a82b577f11e > > вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 18:28, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>: > > > > Hello, Igniters. > > > > While cherry-picking to 2.8.1 I found flaky test regarding BPlusTree > [1], [2] > > > > All failures of this tests relates to PR’s based on 2.8. > > It seems we hav fix in master but doesn’t have it in 2.8 and 2.8.1 > > > > Can someone suggest, what commit fixes this tests? > > > > [1] > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-7895536196794411367&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50 > > > > [2] > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-3485591522651012009&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50 > > > > > > > 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:49, Ivan Bessonov <bessonov...@gmail.com> > написал(а): > > > > > > Sure, here's PR with 3 cherry-picked commits that I mentioned: > > > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708 > > > > > > вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 17:17, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>: > > > > > >> OK then, let’s include it in the 2.8.1 > > >> > > >> Ivan, can you, please, prepare PR in the ignite-2.8.1 branch that > contain > > >> cherry-pick for all required commits? > > >> > > >>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:01, Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org> написал(а): > > >>> > > >>> Hi > > >>> > > >>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to > > >> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication > > >>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring > > >>> > > >>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug fix > release. > > >>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1 > > >>> > > >>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this improvements? > > >>> > > >>> Mainly IGNITE-12756 brings some improvements related with TCP > > >>> communication metrics (performance, memory footprint, > IgniteSpiContext > > >>> improved in order to provide ability to implement metrics related > > >>> SPI's without using internal API's, code improvements) > > >>> > > >>> But! It also fixes potential NPE's which can be thrown on node start. > > >>> So it would be great to include this fix to 2.8.1 release. > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:12 AM Nikolay Izhikov < > nizhi...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks! > > >>>> > > >>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI > > >> metrics > > >>>>>> improvement" - it depends > > >>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735 and > > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568, > > >>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed probably. > > >>>> > > >>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to > > >> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication > > >>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring > > >>>> > > >>>> Ivan, > > >>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug fix > release. > > >>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1 > > >>>> > > >>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this improvements? > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 10:44, Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com> > > >> написал(а): > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Nikolay, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 10:02, Ivan Bessonov <bessonov...@gmail.com > >: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Hello, Igniters, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI > > >> metrics > > >>>>>> improvement" - it depends > > >>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735 and > > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568, > > >>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed probably. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> There might be other issues that I didn't find, we should > probably ask > > >>>>>> Andrey Gura about it, he is the author of > > >>>>>> those changes. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> So, release scope should be expanded a little bit, are you ok > with it? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> пн, 20 апр. 2020 г. в 19:24, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org > >: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Hello, Igniters. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I perform cherry-pick for most commits targeted for 2.8.1 > release. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> TC bot results - > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >> > https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7690%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=pull%2F7102%2Fhead > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I need help with cherry picking the following commits: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> - 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from > > >>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523. > > >>>>>>> - 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT > (#7649) > > >>>>>>> - 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800 SQL: local queries cursors must be > closed > > >> or > > >>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551) > > >>>>>>> - bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted > partition - > > >> Fixes > > >>>>>>> #7494. > > >>>>>>> - 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics > improvement > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Denis Garus, > > >>>>>>> Taras Ledkov, > > >>>>>>> Alexey Plekhanov, > > >>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Can you help me with above commits and cherry-pick your > contribution > > >> in > > >>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 branch? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> CHERRY PICKED: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> + d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi uses log > method > > >>>>>> which > > >>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604) > > >>>>>>> + 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails > > >> BatchUpdateException > > >>>>>>> if function is used (#7615) > > >>>>>>> + b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException when memory > > >> restore > > >>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562 > > >>>>>>> + f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ registration with > > >> failed > > >>>>>>> deployment. (#7620) > > >>>>>>> + 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for metastorage. > (#7606) > > >>>>>>> + 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call with the > > >>>>>> Timestamp > > >>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618) > > >>>>>>> + 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in > > >> MetricRegistryMBean > > >>>>>>> removed. (#7549) > > >>>>>>> + 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files" exception > - > > >> Fixes > > >>>>>>> #7516. > > >>>>>>> + 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression. > > >>>>>>> + ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread > shutdown on > > >>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes #7522. > > >>>>>>> + e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on > > >> cache#putAllAsync - > > >>>>>>> Fixes #7483. > > >>>>>>> + 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. - Fixes > #7469. > > >>>>>>> + f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the MERGE > > >> command > > >>>>>>> (#7321) > > >>>>>>> + 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId generation for > > >> system > > >>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416. > > >>>>>>> + cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages during PME can > > >> prevent > > >>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425. > > >>>>>>> + 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable topology > > >> caused by > > >>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251) > > >>>>>>> + 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on MapResult > > >> close. > > >>>>>>> + 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in Spring Data. - > > >> Fixes > > >>>>>>> #7411. > > >>>>>>> + 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter value > before > > >>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341) > > >>>>>>> + e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in > > >>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge number of > eviction > > >>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399. > > >>>>>>> + bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for eviction policy > > >> cause > > >>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397. > > >>>>>>> + 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record type in > > >>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371. > > >>>>>>> + 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause > NullPointerException > > >>>>>> during > > >>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes #7366. > > >>>>>>> + 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a historical > one > > >> - > > >>>>>>> Fixes #7379. > > >>>>>>> + 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client: deserialization of > > >> arrays, > > >>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320. > > >>>>>>> + 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of last > server > > >> event > > >>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359. > > >>>>>>> + e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown by > > >>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes #7335. > > >>>>>>> + cebc76f1f5d7d077093ddaecbabcd8db2106c60a - IGNITE-12545 > Introduce > > >>>>>>> listener interface for components to react to partition map > exchange > > >>>>>> events > > >>>>>>> + a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency issues for > > >> atomic > > >>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315. > > >>>>>>> + e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during cache > > >> destroy. - > > >>>>>>> Fixes #7298. > > >>>>>>> + 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state when > > >> non-indexed > > >>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290. > > >>>>>>> + e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a > > >> BinaryObject's > > >>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292. > > >>>>>>> + 66593af03aeac37d0e76b6c010e8386f6f0c36c7 - IGNITE-12479 Make > binary > > >>>>>>> metadata be registered only once per type creation > > >>>>>>> + 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node by > > >> consistent ID > > >>>>>>> - Fixes #7151. > > >>>>>>> + 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in WAL > doesn't > > >> work > > >>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148. > > >>>>>>> + b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during recovery on near > > >> node > > >>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274. > > >>>>>>> + 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by other nodes > > >> switch > > >>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node join. - > Fixes > > >>>>>> #7273. > > >>>>>>> + 5bd385935bcba9a1cc271497d1818e9bb4f0318a IGNITE-12227 Fix > failed > > >>>>>>> compilation due to concurrent merge > > >>>>>>> + 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition is > evicted > > >> then > > >>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270. > > >>>>>>> + 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException when > > >>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266. > > >>>>>>> + b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache data and > > >> indexes > > >>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted. > > >>>>>>> + 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in > > >>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086. > > >>>>>>> + 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread dumps > > >> generation on > > >>>>>>> system failure. > > >>>>>>> + c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation > optimized. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> 18 апр. 2020 г., в 18:59, Nikolay Izhikov < > nizhikov....@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>> написал(а): > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> After some scripting I got the following lists of commits to > > >> transfer > > >>>>>>> from master to 2.8.1 > > >>>>>>>> It will be very helpful if someone double check my results. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> I did the following: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> 1. Export all resolved tickets targeted to 2.8.1 from Mira > > >>>>>>>> 2. Found commit difference between 2.8.0 and master > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> git merge-base upstream-http/ignite-2.8 upstream-http/master > > >>>>>>>> git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit > > >>>>>>> 9265c04a368c4cf0fc331aac5a71f7d0db365ea8..HEAD > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> 3. Filter commits to transfer preserving order with the dirty > python > > >>>>>>> script: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> ``` > > >>>>>>>> tickets = set() > > >>>>>>>> founded = {} > > >>>>>>>> with > open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/resolved.csv") as > > >>>>>>> file_in: > > >>>>>>>> for line in file_in: > > >>>>>>>> if not line.startswith('-'): > > >>>>>>>> ticket = line[:-1] > > >>>>>>>> tickets.add(ticket) > > >>>>>>>> founded[ticket] = 0 > > >>>>>>>> print(tickets) > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> with > > >>>>>>> > > >> > open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/commits-after-cut-2.8.txt") > > >>>>>> as > > >>>>>>> file_in: > > >>>>>>>> for commit_msg in file_in: > > >>>>>>>> for ticket in tickets: > > >>>>>>>> if ticket in commit_msg: > > >>>>>>>> print(commit_msg) > > >>>>>>>> founded[ticket] += 1 > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> for ticket in founded.keys(): > > >>>>>>>> if founded[ticket] != 1: > > >>>>>>>> print(ticket + " = " + str(founded[ticket])) > > >>>>>>>> ``` > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Results: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> TO CHERRY PICK (FROM BOTTOM TO TOP): > > >>>>>>>> 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from > > >>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523. > > >>>>>>>> a65e51c914 IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL configuration > and > > >>>>>>> ability to disable SQL functions. (#7593) > > >>>>>>>> d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi uses log > method > > >>>>>> which > > >>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604) > > >>>>>>>> 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails > > >> BatchUpdateException > > >>>>>>> if function is used (#7615) > > >>>>>>>> 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT (#7649) > > >>>>>>>> b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException when memory > > >> restore > > >>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562 > > >>>>>>>> f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ registration with > failed > > >>>>>>> deployment. (#7620) > > >>>>>>>> 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for metastorage. > (#7606) > > >>>>>>>> 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call with the > > >>>>>> Timestamp > > >>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618) > > >>>>>>>> 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in > MetricRegistryMBean > > >>>>>>> removed. (#7549) > > >>>>>>>> 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800 SQL: local queries cursors must be > closed > > >> or > > >>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551) > > >>>>>>>> 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files" exception - > > >> Fixes > > >>>>>>> #7516. > > >>>>>>>> 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression. > > >>>>>>>> bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted partition > - > > >> Fixes > > >>>>>>> #7494. > > >>>>>>>> ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread shutdown > on > > >>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes #7522. > > >>>>>>>> 13637a2dfe IGNITE-12745: Compute job view implemented. (#7495) > > >>>>>>>> e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on > > >> cache#putAllAsync - > > >>>>>>> Fixes #7483. > > >>>>>>>> 4921fcf1fe IGNITE-12701 : Disallow silent deactivation in CLI > and > > >> REST. > > >>>>>>> (#7471) > > >>>>>>>> 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics improvement > > >>>>>>>> e4f9be52f8 IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation refactoring (#7474) > > >>>>>>>> 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. - Fixes #7469. > > >>>>>>>> f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the MERGE > command > > >>>>>>> (#7321) > > >>>>>>>> 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId generation for > > >> system > > >>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416. > > >>>>>>>> cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages during PME can > > >> prevent > > >>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425. > > >>>>>>>> 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable topology > caused > > >> by > > >>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251) > > >>>>>>>> 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on MapResult > close. > > >>>>>>>> 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in Spring Data. - > > >> Fixes > > >>>>>>> #7411. > > >>>>>>>> 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter value > before > > >>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341) > > >>>>>>>> e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in > > >>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge number of > eviction > > >>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399. > > >>>>>>>> bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for eviction policy > > >> cause > > >>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397. > > >>>>>>>> 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record type in > > >>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371. > > >>>>>>>> 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause > NullPointerException > > >>>>>> during > > >>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes #7366. > > >>>>>>>> 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a historical > one - > > >>>>>>> Fixes #7379. > > >>>>>>>> 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client: deserialization of > arrays, > > >>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320. > > >>>>>>>> 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of last > server > > >> event > > >>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359. > > >>>>>>>> e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown by > > >>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes #7335. > > >>>>>>>> a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency issues for > > >> atomic > > >>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315. > > >>>>>>>> e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during cache > > >> destroy. - > > >>>>>>> Fixes #7298. > > >>>>>>>> 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state when > > >> non-indexed > > >>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290. > > >>>>>>>> e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a > > >> BinaryObject's > > >>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292. > > >>>>>>>> 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node by > > >> consistent ID > > >>>>>>> - Fixes #7151. > > >>>>>>>> 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in WAL > doesn't > > >> work > > >>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148. > > >>>>>>>> b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during recovery on near > node > > >>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274. > > >>>>>>>> 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by other nodes > > >> switch > > >>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node join. - > Fixes > > >>>>>> #7273. > > >>>>>>>> 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition is > evicted > > >> then > > >>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270. > > >>>>>>>> 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException when > > >>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266. > > >>>>>>>> b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache data and > > >> indexes > > >>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted. > > >>>>>>>> 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in > > >>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086. > > >>>>>>>> 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread dumps > > >> generation on > > >>>>>>> system failure. > > >>>>>>>> c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation optimized. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> ALREADY IN 2.8.1: > > >>>>>>>> 1b51981c43 IGNITE-8343 Skip IPv6 address if node is started in > > >> 'prefer > > >>>>>>> IPv4' mode. > > >>>>>>>> bd67b31819 IGNITE-12549 Fix query mapping on REPLICATED cache > during > > >>>>>>> rebalance (#7277) > > >>>>>>>> 87a7c4de90 IGNITE-12863 Initialize PojoField accessor after > > >>>>>>> deserialization - Fixes #7624. > > >>>>>>>> 1f34def836 IGNITE-12860 .NET: Fix NRE in > BinaryStructure.GetFieldId > > >>>>>>>> ad6759f955 IGNITE-12757 Visor CMD: Fixed invalid properties - > Fixes > > >>>>>>> #7505. > > >>>>>>>> 5100ec3e5c IGNITE-12672 Fix incorrect parsing of lower-case > > >> statements > > >>>>>>> in Spring Data. > > >>>>>>>> 6a81a7d6db IGNITE-12768: MetricRegistryMBean doesn't show > histogram > > >>>>>>> values in case when histogram name contains underscore character > > >> (#7542) > > >>>>>>>> 8246bd8427 IGNITE-12746 Regression in > GridCacheColocatedDebugTest: > > >>>>>>> putAll of sorted keys causes deadlock - Fixes #7507. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> CLOSED WITHOUT FIX: > > >>>>>>>> IGNITE-12775 = 0 > > >>>>>>>> IGNITE-7414 = 0 > > >>>>>>>> IGNITE-10477 = 0 > > >>>>>>>> IGNITE-8625 = 0 > > >>>>>>>> IGNITE-11862 = 0 > > >>>>>>>> IGNITE-10313 = 0 > > >>>>>>>> IGNITE-10011 = 0 > > >>>>>>>> IGNITE-12767 = 0 > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 19:58, Alexey Goncharuk < > > >>>>>> alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>> написал(а): > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, I will keep the original ticket in patch available > then and > > >>>>>>> leave a > > >>>>>>>>> comment. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Let us know if need any help with moving commits to the release > > >>>>>> branch. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 18:18, Nikolay Izhikov < > nizhi...@apache.org > > >>> : > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Please, don’t cherry pick tickets to 2.8.1 > > >>>>>>>>>> It seems I have to cherry pick many previous tickets for > 2.8.1 to > > >>>>>> avoid > > >>>>>>>>>> conflicts. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 18:01, Alexey Goncharuk < > > >>>>>>> alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>>> написал(а): > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay, > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> If I merge a ticket that is already targeted for 2.8.1 to > > >> master, do > > >>>>>>> you > > >>>>>>>>>>> prefer this ticket to be cherry-picket to 2.8.1 yourself or > > >> should I > > >>>>>>>>>> merge > > >>>>>>>>>>> it to the release branch? > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 16:55, Ivan Pavlukhin < > vololo...@gmail.com > > >>> : > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Great! > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:48, Nikolay Izhikov < > > >> nizhi...@apache.org > > >>>>>>> : > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, let’s try it > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know who is a manager for 2.8.1. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I am. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:42, Ivan Pavlukhin < > vololo...@gmail.com > > >>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а): > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it seems to be a good thing, is not it? I suppose > it > > >> is > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> important to know who is a release manager (the current > thread > > >>>>>>> subject > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a "Manager" keyword). E.g. I do not know who is a > manager > > >> for > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:27, Nikolay Izhikov < > > >>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org > > >>>>>>>> : > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should not we reflect on the release page [1] who is a > > >> release > > >>>>>>>>>>>> manager? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1 release: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, included. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:20, Ivan Rakov < > ivan.glu...@gmail.com > > >>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а): > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1 release: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12101 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12651 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:32 AM Ivan Pavlukhin < > > >>>>>>>>>> vololo...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A side note from an external spectator. Should not we > > >> reflect > > >>>>>> on > > >>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release page [1] who is a release manager? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 11:11, Nikolay Izhikov < > > >>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>> : > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve added all tickets proposed in this thread to > 2.8.1 > > >> scope > > >>>>>>> [1] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For now we have > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 61 resolved tickets. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 19 unresolved tickets. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 01:38, Alex Plehanov < > > >>>>>>> plehanov.a...@gmail.com > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а): > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello guys, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 following bug-fixes > > >> too, > > >>>>>>> which > > >>>>>>>>>>>> are > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already in master: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scan query over an evicted partition can cause node > > >> failure > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12734 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: There were problems with > > >> deserialization > > >>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>> some > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types on > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the client-side, these types can't be used > (IGNITE-12624 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2], IGNITE-12468 [3]) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: Thread doesn't stop properly on > client > > >>>>>> close > > >>>>>>>>>>>> when > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition awareness is enabled, this prevents main() > > >> method > > >>>>>>> from > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exiting > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12743 [4]) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, there is a performance fix for checkpoint read > > >> lock, > > >>>>>>> which > > >>>>>>>>>> I > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to cherry-pick too (IGNITE-12491 [5]). This fix > brings > > >>>>>>>>>> significant > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance boost on environments with a large > number of > > >>>>>> CPUs > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (there > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some drop on such environments introduced in 2.8.0 > for > > >> all > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transactional > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations after IGNITE-12593 fixing) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12734 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12624 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12468 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12743 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12491 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> чт, 16 апр. 2020 г. в 18:48, Maxim Muzafarov < > > >>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>> : > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably, we should not wait for all blocker issues > in > > >>>>>> minor > > >>>>>>>>>>>> bug-fix > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases except very special cases. I think we > should > > >>>>>> release > > >>>>>>>>>> all > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulated bug-fixes `as is` and schedule the next > > >> 2.8.2 > > >>>>>>>>>>>> release. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will allow as to have shorten minor releases. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 18:17, Nikolay Izhikov < > > >>>>>>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’m started to work on this 2.8.1 release [1] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolved issues for release(28) - [2] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unresolved issues for release(30) - [3] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My next step: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. I want to double-check that all commits for the > > >> tickets > > >>>>>>> with > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixVersion=2.8.1 presented in corresponding release > > >> branch. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And cherry-pick losted changes. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. I want to reduce the scope of the release and > > >> exclude > > >>>>>>>>>> tickets > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not ready for now. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you may know, 2.8.1 is a bug fix release. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, I think we can wait only for a blocker > > >> issues. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20and%20status%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20%20and%20status%20not%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8 апр. 2020 г., в 20:15, Вячеслав Коптилин < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slava.kopti...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а): > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12805 > > >> "NullPointerException > > >>>>>>> on > > >>>>>>>>>>>> node > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restart > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when 3rd party persistence and Ignite native > > >> persistence > > >>>>>>> are > > >>>>>>>>>>>> used" > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 scope. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12805 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 19:57, Ilya Kasnacheev < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello! > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done! > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 12:31, Sergey < > > >>>>>> macrerg...@gmail.com > > >>>>>>>> : > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm proposing to add > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12549 > > >>>>>> (fix > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iterators/scan > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> queries for replicated caches) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 2.8.1. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kosarev. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вс, 5 апр. 2020 г. в 01:22, Saikat Maitra < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> saikat.mai...@gmail.com>: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I observed that we already have release 2.8.1 > > >> branch > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case we should be ok to merge these 2 > open > > >> PRs > > >>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>>>>> master > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available for 2.9.0 release. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7240 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7227 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please review and confirm? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saikat > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:19 AM Maxim > Muzafarov < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I support Nikolay Izhikov as the release > manager > > >> of > > >>>>>>> 2.8.1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Apache > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite release. Since no one else of > committers, > > >> PMCs > > >>>>>>>>>>>> expressed > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> desire to lead this release I think we can > close > > >> this > > >>>>>>>>>>>> question > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focus on the release scope and dates. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You helped me configuring TC.Bot that time, > can > > >> you > > >>>>>>> please > > >>>>>>>>>>>> help > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and set `ignite-2.8.1` branch for guard under > > >> TC.Bot > > >>>>>>> [1]? > > >>>>>>>>>>>> We > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start collecting TC statistics for the release > > >> branch > > >>>>>>> as > > >>>>>>>>>>>> early > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:48, Taras Ledkov < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tled...@gridgain.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to add the issue [1] related to SQL > > >> query > > >>>>>>>>>>>> execution > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had omitted this case and Ignite 2.8 > contains > > >>>>>>> serious > > >>>>>>>>>>>> SQL > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cursor of a local query is not thread-safe. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is root cause of several SQL issue, e.g. > JDBC > > >>>>>> thin > > >>>>>>>>>>>> client > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execute query from replicated cache, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PME may hang after execute such queries from > JDBC > > >>>>>>> thin, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> etc. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]. > > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12800 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19.03.2020 17:52, Denis Magda wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As long as 2.8.1 is inevitable and we > already > > >> keep > > >>>>>>>>>> adding > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> critical > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the working queue, let's settle on the > > >> release > > >>>>>>> time > > >>>>>>>>>>>> frames > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who will be a release manager. This is the > time > > >>>>>>> proposed > > >>>>>>>>>>>> by > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personally, I concur with such a schedule: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Scope Freeze: April 15, 2020 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Code Freeze: April 22, 2020 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Voting Date: April 27, 2020 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Release Date: May 1, 2020 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we agree on this time? Is there anybody > who > > >>>>>> ready > > >>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>> drive > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a release manager? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:50 AM Sergey > Antonov < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> antonovserge...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12774 > Transaction > > >>>>>>> hangs > > >>>>>>>>>>>> after > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files NIO exception [1] to ignite-2.8.1 > scope. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12774 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 18 мар. 2020 г. в 16:53, Maxim > Muzafarov < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we add ignite-2.8.1 [2] branch under > > >> TC.Bot > > >>>>>>>>>>>> protection > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > > >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 16:32, Alexey > Goncharuk > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've walked through all the commits to > master > > >>>>>>> since > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filtered some tickets that in my opinion > are > > >>>>>> worth > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release below (note that they are ready > end > > >> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>> effort of > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release should be low as long as > there > > >> are > > >>>>>> no > > >>>>>>>>>>>> implicit > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between tickets). Please share your > opinion > > >> on > > >>>>>>>>>>>> whether we > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them to the 2.8.1. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation > refactoring > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12590 MERGE INTO query is failing > on > > >>>>>> Ignite > > >>>>>>>>>>>> client > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12671 Update of partition's > states can > > >>>>>>> stuck > > >>>>>>>>>>>> when > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed during exchange > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11798 Memory leak on unstable > topology > > >>>>>>> caused > > >>>>>>>>>>>> by > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reservation > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12665 SQL: Potential race on > MapResult > > >>>>>>> close. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12605 Historical (WAL) rebalance > can > > >>>>>> start > > >>>>>>> on > > >>>>>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cleared > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some baseline node leaves the cluster and > > >> then > > >>>>>>> joins > > >>>>>>>>>>>> back. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulate a huge number of eviction > > >> callbacks > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal > record > > >> type > > >>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iteration > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause > > >>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processing if security is enabled > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a > > >>>>>>> historical > > >>>>>>>>>>>> one > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version > of > > >> last > > >>>>>>>>>> server > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiped > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from history > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is > thrown > > >> by > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache creation > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11797 Fix consistency issues for > > >> atomic > > >>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>> mixed > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tx-atomic > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> groups. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12557 Destroy of big cache which > is > > >> not > > >>>>>>> only > > >>>>>>>>>>>> cache > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes IgniteOOME > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal > state > > >> when > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dropped > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum > to a > > >>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the > node > > >> by > > >>>>>>>>>>>> consistent > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record > in > > >> WAL > > >>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> segment > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compaction > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12548 Possible tx desync during > > >> recovery > > >>>>>> on > > >>>>>>>>>>>> near > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by > > >> other > > >>>>>>> nodes > > >>>>>>>>>>>> switch > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MOVING due to counter difference on node > > >> join. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a > partition > > >> is > > >>>>>>>>>>>> evicted > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and historically rebalanced > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12536 Inconsistency between cache > data > > >>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>> indexes > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operation is interrupted > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12403 Throttle page difference > output > > >> in > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12523 Continuously generated > thread > > >> dumps > > >>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>>>>> failure > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processor > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slow > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down the whole system > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12489 Error during purges by > > >> expiration: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Unknown > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BR, Sergey Antonov > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mail-To: tled...@gridgain.com > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> Sincerely yours, > > >>>>>> Ivan Bessonov > > >>>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > -- > > > Sincerely yours, > > > Ivan Bessonov > > > > -- Sincerely yours, Ivan Bessonov
