Hello, Alex.

+1 from me.

> 28 апр. 2020 г., в 15:03, Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com> написал(а):
> 
> Hello guys,
> 
> While we are still waiting for some tickets to resolve I propose to
> cherry-pick to 2.8.1 two more bugfixes:
> IGNITE-12933 Fixed node failure after put incorrect key class for cache
> with indexed types
> IGNITE-12855 Fixed node failure with concurrent get operation and entry
> expiration when persistent is enabled
> Both fixes prevent node failure in some circumstances, both fixed already
> merged to master.
> 
> WDYT?
> 
> пн, 27 апр. 2020 г. в 11:53, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:
> 
>> Taras.
>> 
>> Thank you, very much!
>> You changes merged to 2.8.1 branch.
>> 
>> Igniters,
>> 
>> We have 10 tickets scheduled for 2.8.1 release:
>> 
>> OPEN:
>> 
>> IGNITE-11687    Concurrent WAL replay & log may fail with CRC error on
>> read - Dmitriy Govorukhin
>> IGNITE-12346    .NET: Platform error:System.NullReferenceException -
>> Pavel Tupitsyn
>> 
>> IN PROGRESS:
>> 
>> IGNITE-12637    IgniteSparkSession doesn't start the clients on really
>> distributed cluster - Yaroslav Molochkov
>> IGNITE-12788    Cluster achieved fully rebalanced (PME-free ready) state
>> metric - Nikolay Izhikov
>> 
>> PATCH AVAILABLE:
>> 
>> IGNITE-10417    notifyDiscoveryListener() call can be lost. - Pavel
>> Voronkin
>> IGNITE-12852    Comma in field is not supported by COPY command - YuJue Li
>> IGNITE-12252    Unchecked exceptions during rebalancing should be handled
>> - Nikolai Kulagin
>> IGNITE-12905    QueryKeyValueIterable missing custom spliterator()
>> implementation - Johnny Galatikitis
>> IGNITE-12801    Possible extra page release when throttling and checkpoint
>> thread store its concurrently - Anton Kalashnikov
>> IGNITE-12794    Scan query fails with an assertion error: Unexpected row
>> key - Denis Mekhanikov
>> 
>> 
>>> 27 апр. 2020 г., в 11:08, Taras Ledkov <tled...@gridgain.com>
>> написал(а):
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Nikolay, i've created PR [1] that contains the SQL-related tickets to
>> port into 2.8.1:
>>> 
>>> IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL configuration and ability to
>> disable SQL functions.
>>> IGNITE-12887 Fix handle type mismatch exception on compare values while
>> traversing index tree.
>>> IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
>>> IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be closed or full read to
>> unlock the GridH2Table.
>>> 
>>> TC test are OK. Please take a look at the TC bot report [2].
>>> Please review & merge the patch into ignite-2.8.1.
>>> 
>>> [1]. https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7703
>>> [2].
>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7703%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.8.1
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 23.04.2020 13:25, Mikhail Petrov wrote:
>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>> 
>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 ticket [1].
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> In addition to adding a new metric, it fixes a bug when, after
>> deactivation, GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture#rebalanced flag was not
>> reset. And therefore, it can be different on nodes that are already in the
>> cluster from newly joined ones.
>>>> 
>>>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12788
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Mikhail.
>>>> 
>>>> On 22.04.2020 14:03, Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
>>>>> Hello, Ivan.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think we can include this improvements.
>>>>> Please, go ahead.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 22 апр. 2020 г., в 10:21, Ivan Bessonov <bessonov...@gmail.com>
>> написал(а):
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Igniters,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm continuing with IGNITE-12756 PR creation. It turned out that we
>> need 3
>>>>>> more cherry-picks
>>>>>> to avoid massive code changes. Tests started failing after my initial
>>>>>> attempt to create that PR.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So, in total I have PR with 6 commits in it. Some of them fix
>> components
>>>>>> and tests for them,
>>>>>> others are required for new tests to compile and run without changes
>> in
>>>>>> 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>> RunAll is in progress now and I'll reply with news if I have any.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Andrey Gura, Nikolay Izhikov, are you OK with 3 more commits in the
>> scope?
>>>>>> If you don't,
>>>>>> then I won't be able to port IGNITE-12756 to 2.8.1 properly by
>> myself, I
>>>>>> guess it would be
>>>>>> easier to reimplement it from the scratch.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735
>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568
>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756
>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12756>
>>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12285
>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12668
>>>>>> [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12682
>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 19:36, Pavel Pereslegin <xxt...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hello, Nikolay.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This has been fixed by increasing the test timeout in IGNITE-12683
>> [1][2].
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12683
>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/bf394a77e1de6432e493eb2818243a82b577f11e
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 18:28, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:
>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> While cherry-picking to 2.8.1 I found flaky test regarding BPlusTree
>>>>>>> [1], [2]
>>>>>>>> All failures of this tests relates to PR’s based on 2.8.
>>>>>>>> It seems we hav fix in master but doesn’t have it in 2.8 and 2.8.1
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Can someone suggest, what commit fixes this tests?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>> 
>> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-7895536196794411367&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>> 
>> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-3485591522651012009&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:49, Ivan Bessonov <bessonov...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>> Sure, here's PR with 3 cherry-picked commits that I mentioned:
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 17:17, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org
>>> :
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> OK then, let’s include it in the 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Ivan, can you, please, prepare PR in the ignite-2.8.1 branch that
>>>>>>> contain
>>>>>>>>>> cherry-pick for all required commits?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:01, Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org>
>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to
>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring
>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug fix
>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this improvements?
>>>>>>>>>>> Mainly IGNITE-12756 brings some improvements related with TCP
>>>>>>>>>>> communication metrics (performance, memory footprint,
>>>>>>> IgniteSpiContext
>>>>>>>>>>> improved in order to provide ability to implement metrics related
>>>>>>>>>>> SPI's without using internal API's, code improvements)
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> But! It also fixes potential NPE's which can be thrown on node
>> start.
>>>>>>>>>>> So it would be great to include this fix to 2.8.1 release.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:12 AM Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication
>> SPI
>>>>>>>>>> metrics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
>> probably.
>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to
>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug fix
>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this improvements?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 10:44, Alex Plehanov <
>> plehanov.a...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 10:02, Ivan Bessonov <
>> bessonov...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication
>> SPI
>>>>>>>>>> metrics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement" - it depends
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed
>> probably.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There might be other issues that I didn't find, we should
>>>>>>> probably ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey Gura about it, he is the author of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those changes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, release scope should be expanded a little bit, are you ok
>>>>>>> with it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пн, 20 апр. 2020 г. в 19:24, Nikolay Izhikov <
>> nizhi...@apache.org
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I perform cherry-pick for most commits targeted for 2.8.1
>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TC bot results -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7690%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=pull%2F7102%2Fhead
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I need help with cherry picking the following commits:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
>>>>>>> (#7649)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be
>>>>>>> closed
>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted
>>>>>>> partition -
>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
>>>>>>> improvement
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis Garus,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey Plekhanov,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you help me with above commits and cherry-pick your
>>>>>>> contribution
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 branch?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CHERRY PICKED:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi uses log
>>>>>>> method
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException when
>> memory
>>>>>>>>>> restore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ registration
>> with
>>>>>>>>>> failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for metastorage.
>>>>>>> (#7606)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call with
>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
>>>>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files"
>> exception
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread
>>>>>>> shutdown on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes
>> #7522.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. - Fixes
>>>>>>> #7469.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the
>> MERGE
>>>>>>>>>> command
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId
>> generation for
>>>>>>>>>> system
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages during
>> PME can
>>>>>>>>>> prevent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable
>> topology
>>>>>>>>>> caused by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
>> MapResult
>>>>>>>>>> close.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in Spring
>> Data. -
>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter value
>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge number of
>>>>>>> eviction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for eviction
>> policy
>>>>>>>>>> cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record
>> type in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
>>>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes #7366.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
>> historical
>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client: deserialization
>> of
>>>>>>>>>> arrays,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of last
>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>> event
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes #7335.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + cebc76f1f5d7d077093ddaecbabcd8db2106c60a - IGNITE-12545
>>>>>>> Introduce
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> listener interface for components to react to partition map
>>>>>>> exchange
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> events
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency issues
>> for
>>>>>>>>>> atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during cache
>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state when
>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 66593af03aeac37d0e76b6c010e8386f6f0c36c7 - IGNITE-12479
>> Make
>>>>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metadata be registered only once per type creation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node by
>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in WAL
>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during recovery on
>> near
>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by other
>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node
>> join. -
>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5bd385935bcba9a1cc271497d1818e9bb4f0318a IGNITE-12227 Fix
>>>>>>> failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compilation due to concurrent merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition is
>>>>>>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache data
>> and
>>>>>>>>>> indexes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread dumps
>>>>>>>>>> generation on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation
>>>>>>> optimized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18 апр. 2020 г., в 18:59, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>> nizhikov....@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After some scripting I got the following lists of commits to
>>>>>>>>>> transfer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from master to 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It will be very helpful if someone double check my results.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Export all resolved tickets targeted to 2.8.1 from Mira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Found commit difference between 2.8.0 and master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   git merge-base upstream-http/ignite-2.8
>> upstream-http/master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9265c04a368c4cf0fc331aac5a71f7d0db365ea8..HEAD
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Filter commits to transfer preserving order with the
>> dirty
>>>>>>> python
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> script:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets = set()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> founded = {}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/resolved.csv") as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for line in file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    if not line.startswith('-'):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        ticket = line[:-1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        tickets.add(ticket)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        founded[ticket] = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> print(tickets)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> 
>> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/commits-after-cut-2.8.txt")
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for commit_msg in file_in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    for ticket in tickets:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        if ticket in commit_msg:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>            print(commit_msg)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>            founded[ticket] += 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for ticket in founded.keys():
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if founded[ticket] != 1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    print(ticket + " = " + str(founded[ticket]))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Results:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TO CHERRY PICK (FROM BOTTOM TO TOP):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a65e51c914 IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL
>> configuration
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ability to disable SQL functions. (#7593)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi uses log
>>>>>>> method
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
>>>>>>>>>> BatchUpdateException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT
>> (#7649)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException when
>> memory
>>>>>>>>>> restore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ registration
>> with
>>>>>>> failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for metastorage.
>>>>>>> (#7606)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call with
>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timestamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
>>>>>>> MetricRegistryMBean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be
>>>>>>> closed
>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files"
>> exception -
>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7516.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted
>> partition
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7494.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread
>> shutdown
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes
>> #7522.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13637a2dfe IGNITE-12745: Compute job view implemented.
>> (#7495)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
>>>>>>>>>> cache#putAllAsync -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4921fcf1fe IGNITE-12701 : Disallow silent deactivation in
>> CLI
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> REST.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7471)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
>> improvement
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e4f9be52f8 IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation refactoring
>> (#7474)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. - Fixes
>> #7469.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the MERGE
>>>>>>> command
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (#7321)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId generation
>> for
>>>>>>>>>> system
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages during PME
>> can
>>>>>>>>>> prevent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable topology
>>>>>>> caused
>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on
>> MapResult
>>>>>>> close.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in Spring
>> Data. -
>>>>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7411.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter value
>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge number of
>>>>>>> eviction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for eviction
>> policy
>>>>>>>>>> cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record type
>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
>>>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes #7366.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
>> historical
>>>>>>> one -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client: deserialization of
>>>>>>> arrays,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of last
>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>> event
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes #7335.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency issues
>> for
>>>>>>>>>> atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during cache
>>>>>>>>>> destroy. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state when
>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node by
>>>>>>>>>> consistent ID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in WAL
>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during recovery on
>> near
>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by other
>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node
>> join. -
>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7273.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition is
>>>>>>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache data
>> and
>>>>>>>>>> indexes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread dumps
>>>>>>>>>> generation on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system failure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation
>> optimized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALREADY IN 2.8.1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1b51981c43 IGNITE-8343 Skip IPv6 address if node is started
>> in
>>>>>>>>>> 'prefer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IPv4' mode.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bd67b31819 IGNITE-12549 Fix query mapping on REPLICATED
>> cache
>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance (#7277)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 87a7c4de90 IGNITE-12863 Initialize PojoField accessor after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialization - Fixes #7624.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1f34def836 IGNITE-12860 .NET: Fix NRE in
>>>>>>> BinaryStructure.GetFieldId
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ad6759f955 IGNITE-12757 Visor CMD: Fixed invalid properties
>> -
>>>>>>> Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #7505.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5100ec3e5c IGNITE-12672 Fix incorrect parsing of lower-case
>>>>>>>>>> statements
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Spring Data.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6a81a7d6db IGNITE-12768: MetricRegistryMBean doesn't show
>>>>>>> histogram
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values in case when histogram name contains underscore
>> character
>>>>>>>>>> (#7542)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8246bd8427 IGNITE-12746 Regression in
>>>>>>> GridCacheColocatedDebugTest:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> putAll of sorted keys causes deadlock - Fixes #7507.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CLOSED WITHOUT FIX:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12775 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7414 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10477 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-8625 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11862 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10313 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10011 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12767 = 0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 19:58, Alexey Goncharuk <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, I will keep the original ticket in patch available
>>>>>>> then and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leave a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let us know if need any help with moving commits to the
>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 18:18, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, don’t cherry pick tickets to 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems I have to cherry pick many previous tickets for
>>>>>>> 2.8.1 to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflicts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 18:01, Alexey Goncharuk <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I merge a ticket that is already targeted for 2.8.1 to
>>>>>>>>>> master, do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prefer this ticket to be cherry-picket to 2.8.1 yourself
>> or
>>>>>>>>>> should I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to the release branch?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 16:55, Ivan Pavlukhin <
>>>>>>> vololo...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:48, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, let’s try it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know who is a manager for 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:42, Ivan Pavlukhin <
>>>>>>> vololo...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it seems to be a good thing, is not it? I
>> suppose
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> important to know who is a release manager (the
>> current
>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subject
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a "Manager" keyword). E.g. I do not know who is a
>>>>>>> manager
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:27, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should not we reflect on the release page [1] who
>> is a
>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1 release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, included.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:20, Ivan Rakov <
>>>>>>> ivan.glu...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1 release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12101
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12651
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:32 AM Ivan Pavlukhin <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vololo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A side note from an external spectator. Should not
>> we
>>>>>>>>>> reflect
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release page [1] who is a release manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 11:11, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve added all tickets proposed in this thread to
>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>> scope
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For now we have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 61 resolved tickets.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 19 unresolved tickets.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 01:38, Alex Plehanov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plehanov.a...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello guys,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 following
>> bug-fixes
>>>>>>>>>> too,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already in master:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scan query over an evicted partition can cause
>> node
>>>>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12734
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1])
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: There were problems with
>>>>>>>>>> deserialization
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the client-side, these types can't be used
>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12624
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2], IGNITE-12468 [3])
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: Thread doesn't stop properly on
>>>>>>> client
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition awareness is enabled, this prevents
>> main()
>>>>>>>>>> method
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exiting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12743 [4])
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, there is a performance fix for checkpoint
>> read
>>>>>>>>>> lock,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to cherry-pick too (IGNITE-12491 [5]). This fix
>>>>>>> brings
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> significant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance boost on environments with a large
>>>>>>> number of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPUs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some drop on such environments introduced in
>> 2.8.0
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transactional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations after IGNITE-12593 fixing)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]:
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12734
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]:
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12624
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]:
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12468
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]:
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12743
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]:
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12491
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> чт, 16 апр. 2020 г. в 18:48, Maxim Muzafarov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably, we should not wait for all blocker
>> issues
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bug-fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases except very special cases. I think we
>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulated bug-fixes `as is` and schedule the
>> next
>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will allow as to have shorten minor
>> releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 18:17, Nikolay Izhikov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’m started to work on this 2.8.1 release [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolved issues for release(28) - [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unresolved issues for release(30) - [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My next step:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. I want to double-check that all commits for
>> the
>>>>>>>>>> tickets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixVersion=2.8.1 presented in corresponding
>> release
>>>>>>>>>> branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And cherry-pick losted changes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. I want to reduce the scope of the release
>> and
>>>>>>>>>> exclude
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not ready for now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you may know, 2.8.1 is a bug fix release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, I think we can wait only for a
>> blocker
>>>>>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20and%20status%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20%20and%20status%20not%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8 апр. 2020 г., в 20:15, Вячеслав Коптилин <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slava.kopti...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12805
>>>>>>>>>> "NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restart
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when 3rd party persistence and Ignite native
>>>>>>>>>> persistence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 scope.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12805
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 19:57, Ilya Kasnacheev <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 12:31, Sergey <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> macrerg...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm proposing to add
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12549
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iterators/scan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> queries for replicated caches)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kosarev.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вс, 5 апр. 2020 г. в 01:22, Saikat Maitra <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> saikat.mai...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I observed that we already have release
>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case we should be ok to merge
>> these 2
>>>>>>> open
>>>>>>>>>> PRs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available for 2.9.0 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7240
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7227
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please review and confirm?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saikat
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:19 AM Maxim
>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I support Nikolay Izhikov as the release
>>>>>>> manager
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite release. Since no one else of
>>>>>>> committers,
>>>>>>>>>> PMCs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> desire to lead this release I think we can
>>>>>>> close
>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focus on the release scope and dates.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You helped me configuring TC.Bot that
>> time,
>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and set `ignite-2.8.1` branch for guard
>> under
>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start collecting TC statistics for the
>> release
>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:48, Taras
>> Ledkov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tled...@gridgain.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to add the issue [1] related
>> to SQL
>>>>>>>>>> query
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execution
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had omitted this case and Ignite 2.8
>>>>>>> contains
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serious
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SQL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cursor of a local query is not
>> thread-safe.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is root cause of several SQL issue,
>> e.g.
>>>>>>> JDBC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execute query  from replicated cache,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PME may hang after execute such queries
>> from
>>>>>>> JDBC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12800
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19.03.2020 17:52, Denis Magda wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As long as 2.8.1 is inevitable and we
>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> critical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the working queue, let's settle on
>> the
>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frames
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who will be a release manager. This is
>> the
>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personally, I concur with such a
>> schedule:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Scope Freeze: April 15, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Code Freeze: April 22, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Voting Date: April 27, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Release Date: May 1, 2020
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we agree on this time? Is there
>> anybody
>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drive
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a release manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:50 AM Sergey
>>>>>>> Antonov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> antonovserge...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12774
>>>>>>> Transaction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hangs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files NIO exception [1] to ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>> scope.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12774
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 18 мар. 2020 г. в 16:53, Maxim
>>>>>>> Muzafarov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we add ignite-2.8.1 [2] branch
>> under
>>>>>>>>>> TC.Bot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protection
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 16:32, Alexey
>>>>>>> Goncharuk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've walked through all the commits
>> to
>>>>>>> master
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filtered some tickets that in my
>> opinion
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release below (note that they are
>> ready
>>>>>>> end
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release should be low as long as
>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implicit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between tickets). Please share your
>>>>>>> opinion
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them to the 2.8.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation
>>>>>>> refactoring
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12590 MERGE INTO query is
>> failing
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12671 Update of partition's
>>>>>>> states can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stuck
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed during exchange
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11798 Memory leak on unstable
>>>>>>> topology
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> caused
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reservation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12665 SQL: Potential race on
>>>>>>> MapResult
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12605 Historical (WAL)
>> rebalance
>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cleared
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some baseline node leaves the
>> cluster and
>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> joins
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures
>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulate a huge number of eviction
>>>>>>>>>> callbacks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal
>>>>>>> record
>>>>>>>>>> type
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iteration
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processing if security is enabled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead
>> of a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> historical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for
>> version
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiped
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from history
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is
>>>>>>> thrown
>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache creation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11797 Fix consistency issues
>> for
>>>>>>>>>> atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mixed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tx-atomic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> groups.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12557 Destroy of big cache
>> which
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes IgniteOOME
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal
>>>>>>> state
>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dropped
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized
>> enum
>>>>>>> to a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find
>> the
>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint
>> record
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>> WAL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> segment
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compaction
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12548 Possible tx desync
>> during
>>>>>>>>>> recovery
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> near
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions
>> owned by
>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MOVING due to counter difference on
>> node
>>>>>>>>>> join.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a
>>>>>>> partition
>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and historically rebalanced
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12536 Inconsistency between
>> cache
>>>>>>> data
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operation is interrupted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12403 Throttle page difference
>>>>>>> output
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12523 Continuously generated
>>>>>>> thread
>>>>>>>>>> dumps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down the whole system
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12489 Error during purges by
>>>>>>>>>> expiration:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BR, Sergey Antonov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mail-To: tled...@gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Sincerely yours,
>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
>>>> 
>>> --
>>> Taras Ledkov
>>> Mail-To: tled...@gridgain.com
>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to