+1
08.12.2020, 12:48, "Philipp Masharov" <masharov...@gmail.com>: > Hello! > > Andrey's arguments are solid. > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:23 PM Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1, Java 11 seems to be the only right choice at the moment. >> >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:08 PM Alexey Zinoviev <zaleslaw....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > I totally support Java 11 for development. It's time to go forward >> > >> > вт, 8 дек. 2020 г. в 11:40, Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org>: >> > >> > > Igniters, >> > > >> > > We already had some discussion about using modern Java versions for >> > > Ignite 3.0 development [1] but we still don't have consensus. >> > > As I see from this discussion the strongest argument for Java 11 is >> > > the fact that Java 11 is the latest LTS release which will have >> > > premier support until September 2023. So I don't see any reason for >> > > preferring any other version of Java at this moment. >> > > >> > > The purpose of this thread is to gather opinions about using Java 11 >> > > in the Ignite 3.0 project and, eventually, reach a consensus on this. >> > > >> > > I want to share my several arguments in favor of abandoning Java 8 and >> > > preferring Java 11: >> > > >> > > * Java 8 has gone through the End of Public Updates process for legacy >> > > releases. So it doesn't make sense to start new development on Java 8. >> > > >> > > * Java 9+ brings Jigsaw modularization which allows us to have more >> > > fine-grained structure of Ignite modules and APIs in the future. >> > > >> > > * Ignite actively uses Unsafe functionality which, firstly, isn't >> > > public, and secondly, leads to problems with running Ignite under Java >> > > 9+ (modularization which requires dozens of command-line options in >> > > order to forcibly export corresponding packages) and GraalVM. Such a >> > > situation could be described as bad user experience and we should fix >> > > it. Var handles [2] could be used for solving described problems. >> > > >> > > * Java 9+ introduces Flight Recorder API [3] which could be used in >> > > the Ignite project for lightweight profiling of internal processes. >> > > >> > > Please, share your opinions, objections and ideas about this topic. I >> > > hope we will not have serious disagreements and the consensus will be >> > > reached quickly. >> > > >> > > >> > > 1. >> > > >> > >> >> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Ignite-3-0-development-approach-tp49922p50295.html >> > > 2. >> > > >> > >> https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/api/java/lang/invoke/VarHandle.html >> > > 3. >> > > >> > >> >> https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/docs/api/jdk.jfr/jdk/jfr/FlightRecorder.html >> > > >> >
