My + for java 11
On 08.12.2020 15:00, Nikolay Izhikov wrote:
+1 for using java 11.
8 дек. 2020 г., в 13:18, ткаленко кирилл <tkalkir...@yandex.ru> написал(а):
+1
08.12.2020, 12:48, "Philipp Masharov" <masharov...@gmail.com>:
Hello!
Andrey's arguments are solid.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:23 PM Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org> wrote:
+1, Java 11 seems to be the only right choice at the moment.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:08 PM Alexey Zinoviev <zaleslaw....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I totally support Java 11 for development. It's time to go forward
>
> вт, 8 дек. 2020 г. в 11:40, Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org>:
>
> > Igniters,
> >
> > We already had some discussion about using modern Java versions for
> > Ignite 3.0 development [1] but we still don't have consensus.
> > As I see from this discussion the strongest argument for Java 11 is
> > the fact that Java 11 is the latest LTS release which will have
> > premier support until September 2023. So I don't see any reason for
> > preferring any other version of Java at this moment.
> >
> > The purpose of this thread is to gather opinions about using Java 11
> > in the Ignite 3.0 project and, eventually, reach a consensus on this.
> >
> > I want to share my several arguments in favor of abandoning Java 8 and
> > preferring Java 11:
> >
> > * Java 8 has gone through the End of Public Updates process for legacy
> > releases. So it doesn't make sense to start new development on Java 8.
> >
> > * Java 9+ brings Jigsaw modularization which allows us to have more
> > fine-grained structure of Ignite modules and APIs in the future.
> >
> > * Ignite actively uses Unsafe functionality which, firstly, isn't
> > public, and secondly, leads to problems with running Ignite under Java
> > 9+ (modularization which requires dozens of command-line options in
> > order to forcibly export corresponding packages) and GraalVM. Such a
> > situation could be described as bad user experience and we should fix
> > it. Var handles [2] could be used for solving described problems.
> >
> > * Java 9+ introduces Flight Recorder API [3] which could be used in
> > the Ignite project for lightweight profiling of internal processes.
> >
> > Please, share your opinions, objections and ideas about this topic. I
> > hope we will not have serious disagreements and the consensus will be
> > reached quickly.
> >
> >
> > 1.
> >
>
http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Ignite-3-0-development-approach-tp49922p50295.html
> > 2.
> >
>
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/api/java/lang/invoke/VarHandle.html
> > 3.
> >
>
https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/docs/api/jdk.jfr/jdk/jfr/FlightRecorder.html
> >
>
