Hi Igniters,

> I think this guide should be much shorter and simple.

As you know we also have CONTRIBUTING.md [1] on GitHub. Perhaps it can
be the shortest one for newcomers.

[1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md

2021-03-15 21:56 GMT+03:00, Kseniya Romanova <romanova.ks....@gmail.com>:
>>
>> > Components and their maintainers
>> > It seems that this list should be updated too.
>> I would be glad if somebody does it, but I don't have any more
>> information
>> to fill there.
>
>
> I'll be happy to collect information and update this section. But I also
> think this should be a separate page (and howto should have a link on it).
>
> пн, 15 мар. 2021 г. в 18:25, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org>:
>
>> Ilya,
>>
>> Thanks for the effort!
>>
>> I think this guide should be much shorter and simple.
>> Right now it is intimidating for newcomers.
>>
>> What they need is basically
>> * Register in Jira, pick a ticket, assign, put In Progress
>> * Create a fork, implement
>> * Create a PR
>> * Ask for review
>>
>> Maybe we should have a separate, detailed guide for Committers,
>> and a simple one for Contributors?
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 6:19 PM Ilya Kasnacheev
>> <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello!
>> >
>> > Please see inline.
>> >
>> > пн, 15 мар. 2021 г. в 18:06, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>:
>> >
>> > > Hello,
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > Ignite employs both Review-Then-Commit processes.
>> > >
>> > > The Commit-Then-Review (CTR) removed?
>> > >
>> > I don't see any applications of CTR during the few last years.
>> > Streamers
>> > were supposed to be CTR but Saikat Maitra still asked for the review of
>> > streamers-related commits.
>> >
>> > > Information for committers
>> > >
>> > > Do we need this on a page for newcomers? I'd like to mention that
>> > > some
>> > > of the committers still use the commit script, however, I think it
>> > > will be better to configure the GitHub interaction.
>> > >
>> > I don't think there's a separate page for committers. If there is,
>> > please
>> > point me to it, and we can remove the section. I don't think we should
>> > be
>> > writing two pages at once, so I decided not to drop any essential
>> > information.
>> >
>> > > Components and their maintainers
>> > >
>> > > It seems that this list should be updated too.
>> > >
>> > I would be glad if somebody does it, but I don't have any more
>> information
>> > to fill there.
>> >
>> >
>> > > > Working on a ticket
>> > > I think we should mention the Intellij IDEA checkstyle plugin and its
>> > > configuration (importation of checkstyle.xml to the IDE).
>> > >
>> > I would be glad if somebody contributes to it, or we may just provide a
>> > link to coding guidelines and mention it there.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > > GIT workflow
>> > >
>> > > Do we need it?
>> > >
>> > I think we do, this workflow is non-trivial and I don't think it is
>> > documented anywhere. We can get rid of ASCII art section, though.
>> >
>> > WDYT?
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 17:25, Ilya Kasnacheev <
>> ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Hello!
>> > > >
>> > > > When adding new users to the Contributor role, we usually give them
>> > > > a
>> > > link
>> > > > to "How to Contribute" wiki page.
>> > > >
>> > > > However, I was feeling that it was in many ways outdated, referring
>> to
>> > > > outdated development practices and not emphasising TC tests and
>> > > > MTCGA
>> > > bot.
>> > > >
>> > > > So we took liberty to rewrite this page, meet
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+to+Contribute+2021
>> > > >
>> > > > We tried to streamline it, make it more friendly to newcomers and
>> just
>> > > > shorter.
>> > > >
>> > > > Please check it out, share your feelings.
>> > > >
>> > > > I plan to replace the legacy
>> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+to+Contribute
>> > > with
>> > > > this page based on your feedback..
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > > --
>> > > > Ilya Kasnacheev
>> > >
>> >
>>
>


-- 

Best regards,
Ivan Pavlukhin

Reply via email to